That does make more sense, I love this way of clear-thinking.
And that got me to wondering:
Imagine how good it would be, if we could have a music device… in the beginning, in the planning, it’s open to people’s inputs and ideas. They’re whittled down, and a ‘best-of’ is worked out, maybe people vote etc.
Then some kind, thoughtful, billionaire (ex synth-nerd, made a lot money in crypto, or perhaps pre-buying synths before Trump tax) comes along and gives the community the money to fund it’s build and development.
Clever bastards like your good self, and others, design the firmware, which is, and will remain, open-source.
The music device also has room for user oscs/user fx, so others can code their own and sell them or release for free.
Loads of people buy the device.
It gets amazing firmware and a great user experience because of community goodness.
The billionaire makes a bit of cash back from all the sales. They donate most to charity, and of course they give me a good ole chunk for having this great idea in the first place.
Everyone’s happy.
And before any twats start shooting this idea down with their fucking nonsense shit like ‘logic’, ‘common sense’, and ‘actual knowledge on how stuff actually works’… it’s a fucking dream, all right? It doesn’t have to make sense!
