Good for you, but I much prefer the LXR-02 hats (although I prefer the M:C sequencing over the LXR sequencing).
Iād pay for an audio in 
i once also couldnt get what other peoples problem with the hi hat is, but if youāve listened to it on every track you cant hear it anymore.
please stop with the prefix/suffix analysis
we get it. its not an ARG puzzle
2 Likes
Whatās the matter? Is your syn out of takt?
(Couldnāt resist) 
3 Likes
Are u sure? Who say so?
Or itās just a guess?
Problem is, the interface would not be nearly as awesome if they have to use it in a completely new context. Itās very much built for a specific machine: repurposing it for something else entirely isnāt as easy as it you make it seem.
2 Likes
Probably just a guessā¦ after all, it was said that Digitakt was maxed out before the 1.30 updateā¦ then they added another LFO.
I like the 1010music philosophy:
"If you have experienced drop outs or crackling sounds with blackbox, you have most likely pushed the processor to its limits. Blackbox does not limit what you can do based on anticipated processor load. We have tried to balance the design of the system to optimize what you can do without over driving the processor while still giving you room to make creative choices. "
Elektron on the other hand must ensure you can use all features on all voices at once without any audio drop outs. Itās a big constraint, but also a guaranty.
3 Likes
Syn + takt, takt can mean quite a few things but I think in this sense (as with the Digitakt) itās around pace/beat. My Swedish is pretty crap though, Iām just an immigrant 
1 Like
Hard to tell whatās better. But. I do believe that digi synths have to be upgradable like personal computers, want more voices - go get new 12 core Xeon, put it inside and no probsā¦
Same with memory, etcā¦
Canāt think of anything Iād want less.
15 Likes
Yeah, I donāt get it. Why would you want to turn a synth more into a computer? Computers are horrible. We already have, and Elektron is one of the biggest culprits, synths that have all the bad sides of computers. 0-day patches, advertised features that wonāt be implemented until years down the line etc.
1 Like
What if Elektron is only in the initial stages with the Syntakt and it isnāt planned to be released for another 3 years?
3 Likes
Memes. Memes for years.
8 Likes
then weāre f***d 
2 Likes
Yes iād take a lot of the development time but i think in the case of DT is really possible.
The sound source comes from just 1 page in the UI, the rest is mangling that source. That source page could be different for different engines but the rest could stay the same.
That would be amazing, converting the digitakt in a 16-track synth/sampler groovebox.
2 Likes
Possible, but far more frequently a company takes a trademark much much later stage in the development cycle. Look at Elektronās history with that, i posted about that earlier. There are posts following that with more on the timeliness with specific Elektron products.
The Digitakt trademark came after the product was first shown, which also has been discussed earlier.
2 Likes
Yeah donāt get me wrong, itās a cool concept. I just donāt see it happening, same reason why the OT canāt have updated FX. The devices are built for a specific purpose on the component level and repurposing them for a completely new purpose isnāt probably worth it. There probably isnāt enough unused processing power to just throw in synth functionality.
1 Like
Yeah it seems very difficult actually, but who knows, maybe the Syntakt will be the next hardware synth built for that (?) hahaha