What Is Your Most Productive Set Up/Workflow?

  1. Circuit / Circuit Tracks
  2. MC-101 / MC-707
  3. Axoloti

Circuit provides the most convenient sequencer ever, that’s how i actually work on my patterns IRL — i create them in Circuit and then record to 101/707 clips.
it would be even better if it had some more scales in scale mode, but it is what it is (and there are workarounds).

also, Circuit works well as finger drumming surface, but to make it do this job with external gear – black Axoloti magic required.

EDIT: however convenient Circuit is, 2 synth tracks is just 2 tracks.
if i need to create a new track in an hour or so, i certainly prefer more — it’s easier & faster to compose several simple patterns and layer them than squeeze the maximum from just 2 tracks.

2 Likes

Well I’ve switched the modular a bit since that picture, it’s now a DFAM, Quadrantid Swarm and a slightly augmented Erica Fusion System. So it kinda works like 3 separate synths, but all interconnected in various ways.

I’ve got the OT setup mainly as mixer and FX for everything, supplying midi clock to the QS, which then sends the clock on to everything else, and a couple of sample tracks for drums, but it’s ready to sample anything going through it, should the need arise.

1 Like

Mine is going to have to be. Dismmising most ios apps I bought and use screens for apps that are like tweaking hardware. Thats with euclidean drums. So maybe the fastest way to make music ( EVA )

You just have to be content with euclidean sequencing I guess.

App combos I thought of yesterday are. Poison 202. Primer or phasemaker as fm. Or mononoke in place of either of above.

Other ipad. Ripplemaker and shockwave combo.

Then a 3rd ipad for granular/shoom or skiid.

1 Like

But theres a tonebooster synth soon. I might just buy apps that can tweak via screen. Should I continue to not bother patching much.

The sad/embarrassing fact is that I’ve acquired more gear in the last 18 months than I could ever incorporate in one dedicated set up… I am very envious of people who stick with one focussed set up and get to the point where it’s an extension of them… I suppose that’s my goal.

To answer my own question, if I had to knock something up fast right now, I’d use;

  • Analog Rytm
  • Analog Four
  • Digitone
  • Novation Peak

Stereo mix to Zoom H4n.
File export to Logic for pseudo-mastering.

4 Likes

This is mine, from the hybrid setup thread:

This has been significantly more productive for me than any of my past setups. Having the UAD plugins on the channels on the way in shortcuts a lot of faffing about in the DAW, while the E-RM multiclock means I can jam with or without the computer, but when recording it’s all bang on the grid all the time and I never worry about sync, latency etc.

The only thing I’m looking to change is to add a satellite UAD processor so I can run more plugins at once and stop worrying about DSP resource while I’m trying to create.

2 Likes

…coming up with some way or the other fancy sonic phrases with my hardware/instruments…
…writing and singing along to that…waiting for the moment where it all starts to pop…
…that moment where u realise, NOW all of a sudden things add up to become more than just the sum of it’s details…always THE magic moment…
…recording all those single elements that piled up to that sonic cake of looping phrases via a decent audio interface to some daw grid…
…start to nail the overall arrangement and mix chemistry…
…getting into details within that daw grid…maybe adding further single recordings…
…like further lead lines, additional harmony content, add lipps…
…starting final mix…
…managing how to reproduce all that in a live situation…
…nailing final mix status…
…sending final bus stems or that one final stem to final mix and / or mastering process…
…like or dislike the final result…reflecting on the question, if i want to release and / or perform what i came up with…

If I only had an hour to come up with a full track, I’d use only an op-z.
Second choice would be DT.
Third choice DN.

My modular system. If I start inserting patch cables always something pops up . Good, bad or ugly… but something happens for sure. It’s my favorite workflow.

2 Likes

Octatrack - although it takes a while to learn. Once set up I don’t even need one hour for a track.

I think you can work quick and efficient with any gear.

This is something that always comes up in These discussions, because we all have been through this right??
I have been searching for a perfect Setup for ages, just to find out that I will get there if I stop searching xD

4 Likes

Akai Force + Microfreak. All I need. I added a Digitone and an Analog Heat but haven’t had time to test this setup.

1 Like

Renoise for me. I can come up with ideas quickly it’s really easy to build up sections then work in transitions, and the renoise engine/headroom management just sounds good without a lot of faffing.

Could be a good elektronaut challenge

2 Likes

Guitar - SiX - MPC Live - SiX - H1n

What an awesome comfy super fast no assholery setup.

2 Likes

A4 + AR then over usb into ableton in one take. But I don’t think I “make tracks” really, yet. So far been mainly starting from sound design in AR -> then make a beat -> add A4 for pad/lead/tonal

EDIT: probably via AH actually if recording

1 Like

Track in an hour? Ableton.

6 Likes

Bass guitar, DI box1, mixer Ch1, DI 1 thru, overdrive, flanger, DI box2, mixer Ch2, send to OTO bam wet, back ch5.
AR, mixer ch3, send to OTO Boum, and back ch6.
Might put a synth melody (live recorded to midi) on ch4.
Press Record.

2 Likes

I’m the same way. Once I get going I can do more of the technical stuff faster on Ableton. But in terms of sitting down and making quick tracks, nothing beats simply Octatrack and a crate of records, or Octatrack and any 1 poly synth. In fact, I’ve just now opened up Ableton to continue a track I’ve been working on, and it most definitely turned into a sit and stare session. So now it’s time to change gears and sample a few strange/random records or get a patching session started to get the juices flowing again.

I feel the same way. If the brief is “make a song in an hour”, I’d need to go in the box.

To be fair Logic now has some very Elektron-like tools, so it wouldn’t be totally painful. That said, my preference lately has been to start on hardware, record, and arrange in a DAW, but given the context that would be too slow.

If the question was “what are you most productive on”, and we’re talking ideas versus fully completed songs, then I’d say the Octatrack.

laptop + ableton

1 Like

The way I’ve setup my last few OT Parts, it’s definitely made things more immediate for me. I’m real fast and comfortable in Ableton but this has become even more efficient for me, now that it’s all set up.

Track 1 is a kick chain (64) and there are a few other kick chains in adjacent slots for fast switching
Track 2 is a percussion loop chain (64) plus more in adjacent slots
Track 3 is a hi hat chain (64) single shots.
Track 4 is another percussion loop chain but with more low end content (64)
Track 5 has about 128 bars of DFAM bass material, loop chain.
Track 6 is another 128 bars of DFAM, but more lead material, loop chain.
Track 7 is open flex for anything that might require slicing.
Track 8 is master track with p-lockable compressor and a small touch of master dark reverb.

It’s a very “Mise en place” configuration.
Leaning so heavily on chains, I have immediate access to 128 different single shot samples, and 512 different loops, all instantly switchable via the start point parameter. And it’s all content that I can easily mangle with conditional trigless trigs, FX, p-locks, LFOs, and scenes.

When starting a new tune I simply paste one of these parts in, and 30-45 minutes later I’ve got a few patterns that I can develop into a live recorded tune, or use for 5-6 minutes of live set material.

25 Likes