Just more proof that we have not scratched the surface of where this will be going, even if this is an obvious addition to the palette of options.
3 Likes
It was only an option in the bus, but who knows with it being an in development thing where it ends up.
1 Like
Sounds good to me!
great catch. so up for this!
1 Like
They’ve been sat waiting smugly for this watching the abuse flood past
4 Likes
That’s a fantastic find! Thanks for sharing.
1 Like
Tonverk: the leak machine
2 Likes
Well this has put the cccccaaaaattaaaatttaccaaaat among the pigeons!
7 Likes
Well, that really verks my tone.
2 Likes
Elektron’s leaking their own updates from inside the OS now? Somebody datamine the whole thing 
6 Likes
Ohhh…that would be a tasty addition to the Heat+FX too. It’s way overdue for a nice update, soooooo 
Not sure if it can handle that hardware-wise though, but we can dream…
Would require a lot of RAM I’d imagine
AH + FX has 4GB of RAM?
Apology, I thought you were talking about Tonverk. Missing context.
I wonder why the Granulator INSERT FX did not make it into TV 1.0 in the first place. From a technical perspective, would it work with audio from any of the INs, e.g. in cases where there’s no “prebuffered” samples available? “Huge” latency otherwise?
Well clearly there are many other areas that they need to focus the development on for a good while before they can finish nice addons like this, so probably will still be awhile unless it’s further along than it seems from this placeholder UI. I don’t think the audio in would be any issue, all the current FX work for audio in, though I do imagine it would have some latency as you say since it can’t do things like “scan” through data it doesn’t have yet. Who knows how the implementation will be in the end.
I kinda hope when (ok, if) a granulator comes it’s as a source machine rather than an insert effect.
8 Likes
yes, that’s what I’m hoping for as well. If I recall, I had submitted a related feature request on the DTII feature request thread at some point, in which I asked for a play-head that could be modulated. That would enable wild possibilities such as plock’able scratch effects, ping-pong loops and time-stretching etc
1 Like
As an insert effect, you could use it on single, multi, and sub tracks, as well as external input, so I think that is a better option as it gives you more flexibility. And it seems that is what they’re working on, but could always change of course.
4 Likes
True, that would be the advantage of having it as an insert effect. It does give you more flexibility in terms of routing. But it gives you much less flexibility in the type of granular processing you could do. You wouldn’t have access to a whole sample, just incoming audio, so it would be limited to more of a granular delay type effect. Which is cool too, and I hope we get both!
1 Like