Back before the OP-Z was released, TE specified that it’s not really an OP-2, but a different thing altogether. Pretty much all their products have the naming convention of two letters followed by a number. OP-1, OB-4, TX-6, TP-7, PO-32 and so on. The notable exceptions would be OP-Z and OP-XY. My guess is as good as any other guess, but following this naming convention, I’d assume the OP-XY is closer to the OP-Z than any other of their products. But yeah, could be an entirely new thing altogether.
It’s the op-z (v 2.0)
Aka the FIXED Z
They can’t call it the Z 2.0 because that would bring an alarming halt to op-z sales and people are still buying them despite 100% failure rate at some point with the double triggers
So they called it the Next thing op-y the x is for the v2.0 is op-xy = op-z2
Quite simple
Still no leaks?
( What if they are right, and it IS a op-z 2
… Then Thursday in school all the popular kids are going to point at me and laugh, and I will never have the guts to ask Jenny T. if I she wants to go with me to the prom
)
This is absurd if we compare it to the ableton move
Instead of waiting for the announcement and potentially buying whatever this thing was i bought myself a pair of Thursday boots (symbolically), a nice Parajumpers jacket and RLL jeans!
Heh two weeks of mind games? I don’t think so!
guess we have to wait until thursday.
ho hum…
Must resist…must resist…
TE are a playful company, so I always thought the letter Z was a cheeky visual nod to the number 2.
Well it’s got to be an operator of some kind. In the TE naming conventions, these always produce sound.
Bastl Instruments dropping the Wizard ♂ on the same day
Visual synthesizer?
sorta looks like it
That would be really cool. Looking forward for the 14th!
strange it’s listing standard linescale types like a drafting program. now i’m stumped.