For now I am thinking of each bank of a Project as a ‘jammable section’ (song) of a live performance.
So, as we know, each bank is made up of sixteen patterns. My new idea was to think of them like this:
01 | 02 | 03 | 04
-----------------
05 | 06 | 07 | 08
-----------------
09 | 10 | 11 | 12
-----------------
13 | 14 | 15 | 16
Of course, nothing actually moves, I’m just imagining them like this.
the idea
Closer to the top of the grid, there will be less rhythm/drums, and closer to the bottom of the grid there will be more rhythm/drums.
and
Closer to the left of the grid, there will be less harmony/melody, and closer to the right of the grid, there will be more harmony/melody.
So, from a blank bank I start composing things on pattern 11. I build up 8 tracks that sound nice together—this is always the easy part with the OT. But now (!) I have something to do. Say I want to hear a variation with some of the drums dropped out. Instead of just muting the drums—which tracks are the drums again (?) —I copy pattern 11 and paste it on pattern 7; then I take away some of the trigs from the tracks doing drum stuff. Then, copy/paste pattern 7 to pattern 3, take away even more drums.
So then, I’m just walking to adjacent squares on the grid, copy/pasting patterns adding and removing trigs as appropriate to get more or less of drums/rhythm or harmony/melody. Moreover, if I need to vary machine settings I can copy and paste the Part, associate it with the specific pattern and affect the variation that way. When performing, I don’t even need to know that this was done (!).
Now, when I switch into a new bank, I can know how to vary and jam it without having to remember all the details of how it was composed. I just know if I want more musical elements I go ‘right’ in the grid, and I want fewer drums so I go ‘up’ in the grid (or whatever). With some juicy scenes set up, moving the fader and switching patterns I can get a lot of variation.
I am getting better at the various copy/paste finger contortions necessary to quickly produce the variations, but there’s more practicing to do in this area.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on these ideas, and any related tips or follow ups you may have. I have not thought of a great way to compose long elaborate sequences (e.g., buildups) in this framework yet—pattern chaining? arranger? who knows?—for example.
Anyway, the OT is fun.