New Teenage Engineering products

the first loop mode mentioned is on the ep133, the second loop thing he mentioned is not. but i cant totally tell the difference between the second loop thing he mentioned and the sample playback modes on the ep133

just looked in the manual and yeah i dont get what the purpose is. you can set mute states or something for the built in loops? but the loops can only start on the first step of a pattern? i dunno, i feel like im missing something

2 Likes

No. When you load a sample with that loop mode set into the KO2, it shows an error message saying “Unknown Play mode.”

2 Likes

From the video, the new loop mode seems to repeat a 2-bar loop within a 1-bar sequence, similar to the One-Shot Playback mode on the SP-404MK2.

Perhaps they wanted to implement something like an audio clip in Ableton.

2 Likes

Hey captain8,

Excellent question.

I assumed the same as you at first.

  • However, while I was researching the OB-4,
    For the purpose of using it to play instruments in real-time,

I soon discovered that:

  • Even the wired line-in inputs,
    For Bluetooth-capable portable speakers from mainstream manufacturers,
    Exhibit universally unusable latency for playing instruments in real-time.

Why?

  • The Reasons Are Structural, Not Brand-Specific.

⸻

Before the OB-4 3/25/22 OS Update:

OB-4 users observed discernible, distracting, &, for my intended purposes,
Deal-breaking, wired line-in latency issues.

As demonstrated in this 8/26/21 YouTube clip:

:scissors:
TE OB-4 Video (8/26/21): Clip Showing Previous Line-In Latency Issue.
OS 3/25/22 Update Solved Latency Issue (~5 ms Line-In → Audio Out).

However, fast forward to 3/25/22:

New OB-4 Update? (op.forums.com)

  • After the above OS update,
    I saw a significant amount of OB-4 users on multiple forums,
    Reporting that the wired line-in latency was no longer an issue.

  • Upon reading the reports, I obtained an OB-4 in April 2022,
    & confirmed that the OB-4’s previously reported wired line-in latency,
    Is now a nonissue, as I am very sensitive to timing delays related to latency.


Going Back to the “Why?”:

  • After the 3/25/22 OS update, the OB-4 is now an anomaly,
    Regarding how its negligible wired line-in latency,
    Currently compares to other Bluetooth-capable portable speakers.
  • Even when using a wired 3.5mm input,
    Most portable Bluetooth speakers aren’t designed like studio monitors.

  • As most portable Bluetooth speakers route audio through:
    Internal DSP (Digital Signal Processing) Stages,
    Before the audio comes out of the speakers.

    These Stages Often Include:

DSP Stage Purpose Adds Latency?
A/D Conversion Converts analog jack input to digital Yes
EQ / Loudness Profiles Signature sound tuning Yes
Dynamic Compression Prevents distortion at high volumes Yes
Stereo Widening Effects Enhances consumer sound Yes
Room Correction / Spatial Modes Some higher-end models Yes
Crossovers for Multi-Driver Speakers Splits frequencies between woofer / tweeter Yes
  • Because of this,
    Even using a Bluetooth-capable portable speaker’s wired line-in,
    Is often delayed by 20–100 ms,
    Which is usually fine for music listening,
    But terrible for live instrument monitoring or DJing.

⸻

Typical Line-In Latency Ranges (Wired Aux):

Category of Speaker Typical Wired Latency Suitable for Live Instruments?
Cheap Mini Bluetooth Speakers 50–150 ms No
Mid-Range BT Speakers (JBL, Sony, Bose) 30–90 ms No
Smart Speakers (Sonos, HomePod) 80–200 ms No
High-End Audiophile Bluetooth Speakers 20–60 ms No
Teenage Engineering OB-4 (Post-Update) ~5 ms Excellent
  • Most Consumer Speakers Prioritize “Sound Enhancement”, Not Low Latency.

⸻

Bluetooth vs. Wired Aux Latency:

Bluetooth Latency:

  • Even with aptX Low Latency, a user rarely sees below 40 ms latency.

  • Without special codecs, common latency is 120–300 ms,
    Which is far too delayed for instruments or DJ work.

Wired Aux Latency:

  • Should be nearly instant in theory,
    But due to DSP, most consumer speakers still add delay.

  • This is why musicians & DJs,
    Don’t use consumer Bluetooth speakers for real-time performance.

  • Rather,
    They use studio monitors, PA speakers, or dedicated low-latency designed devices.

⸻

After the March 2022 Firmware Update,
The OB-4’s updated ~5 ms Aux/line-in latency is now comparable to:

  • Pro Audio Interfaces
  • Stage Monitors
  • Studio Gear

This makes the OB-4 of the very few (or only?),
Bluetooth-capable portable speaker(s) suitable for:

  • Live Instrument Monitoring
  • Jammin’
  • Sampling Without Noticeable Delay

If you plug a synth, sampler, guitar, or DJ controller,
Into a typical Bluetooth speaker with a 3.5mm cable,

You will almost always hear a small but noticeable delay,
Annoying enough to make timing feel “off”.

The OB-4 is now exceptional,
Because it behaves more like a Portable Studio Monitor,
As opposed to a Consumer Bluetooth Speaker.

5 Likes

Complaining about bad demos and not even fretting about which Synthtuber will get cancelled first for doing a horribly racist Jamaican accent?

4 Likes

on the riddim are the supertones multisamples or built in synthesis?
as in if we clear the internal memory are these wiped too, or remain alongside a new user sample set? or user can change supertones with their own multisamples?

Looks very cool - nice case and the inclusion of the microphone is pretty badass. Probably doesn’t fit my niche but tempting none the less. Tried to convince myself that I could make some dope dub techno with it but probably the wrong tool for the job…

Link: Teenage Engineering EP-40 Riddim n’ Ting

Guess can load it with any samples (even from the original and Medievel)?

1 Like

It’s a cool idea, but I wish they would get on and make a big version of the Tonic.

Microtonic in a decent sized bit of hardware would be a total gamechanger.

6 Likes

Yep, and the full 128mb memory is accessible!

The TingFX microphone seem really cool but I wish they had fixed that awful pop everytime you engage it.

It was just as bad in the Andertons video, unfortunately.

Confused… anyone know why the OP-Z, OP-1, and OP-XY are allowed their own threads, but the EP-40 and siblings are not?

4 Likes

Do we know if the EP-40 has the same send fx comp + master comp?

At 5.54, he says that the ep133 will be getting the super tone engines via software update. Anyone heard this elsewhere? That and loop support would be very welcome.

2 Likes

Yeah it’s a little odd, you’d think a dedicated thread would be better in the long term.

2 Likes

yeah i dunno what kinda cough the mods are snoking, both the EP-133 and the Medieval have their own threads

6 Likes

I might buy one to take it apart and see :grin::grin:.

An explanation for the merges here ..

I’ve asked, the issue is that the news phase of a release is reliably insufferably toxic in nature and thankless to administer … so that toxicity is lumped into a single mutable topic and actual users with actual hands on questions are invited to start user topics, but i may be misquoting … all i know is that the community were the ones who pointed this ‘understanding’ out and another admin sorted that out earlier; i followed suit

when it’s being pitched as news it’s to be within this topic and when it’s for the users (and sans toxicity) it’d be in a user topic

I don’t care, so long as it isn’t attracting flags and/or ‘conspiracy’ abuse; TE news ranks up there with religion and politics as a thankless sideshow of moderating on an Elektron focused forum because it attracts all the wrong sort of interest, invariably from folk with no intention to buy it … thus the toxicity

I’ve no intention to buy any of it, but i don’t feel the compulsion to write about it, for some others it’s bait for some kind of lols, i dunno …

… so when established community members were flagging new topics as ripe to merge, i asked where and why and this ‘understanding’ came out in the wash … i have TE topics muted so that’s why it was unclear to me at that stage

Frankly, and ironically, it’s more of a burden this way, but there simply can’t be a breeding ground for all the TE toxicity on multiple news topics, because invariably actual users will come along and ask to have the topic cleaned up from all the added noise … you can’t win, there’s been four attempts thus far, but none as yet from a user with questions rather than just an opinion to offload, which is fine here … i’ve no horse in this race, except a deep desire to not see flags emerge from infighting predicated on there being only lovers/haters when it comes to TE; nothing is black/white like this, but some enjoy the dopamine from edging it this way

I’m already out, so I think my perspective is covered … a user should start a users’ topic with a declared focus on keeping it about usage and pointing to here for the rest ?! The ‘Why’ probably relates to the peculiarities of TE’s product portfolio … it has evidently flushed out all the opinionated

I’m not looking to answer opinions on this, just elucidating the facts ftr

3 Likes

i dont understand how this is different than the paradigm presented for every other piece of gear released by any other company

3 Likes

TE EP-series Users thread sounds about right then? i think it would be overkill to have a thread for each one as they’ll all be the same after the fw udpate, just different sample sets?

think they are relasing a specific EP mixer soon too. so it can all lump in

off topic and ragebait opinions will get flagged so not sure it alleviates moderation…

5 Likes