Biggest issue with s950 aside from price is the incredibly complicated or more, laborious, interface. It would be like a headache every time you used it until you developed a clunky workflow.
I got a budget alternative in the sp202 and I’m pretty content with the sound, I don’t know if it lives up to the moniker of “The poor mans sp1200” but for my purposes it turns the sterility of the digitakt into something very palatable and human sounding - also the effects are weird and cool.
I think you made a smart buy, I’m just saying that if you enjoy the sound of the md uw it’s different than if you just want to add some sampling to your workflow.
You may well be correct but I think when you look at the cost of producing something using old technology when none of the parts they are using are particularly rare parts, and the only workflow updates came in the form of memory and expandable memory, they are probably doing pretty well with the price per unit considering that they’re sold out on a waiting list basis.
Moreover, since you’re buying a horse from the guy who invented horses, you know that you’re getting something that is what you want and will last as opposed to something that probably needs expensive maintenance and will have a vintage tax of x amount more on top.
I’m not saying it isn’t a great thing for people who are hard up for an sp1200 (I might be if I were deluded into thinking it would change my life) but I’m positive the cost of manufacturing technology from 1987, even if it’s by hand, is significantly lower than reinventing the octatrack if I had to use an analogy.