I’m probably going to end up building a laser-cut plywood “cover” that works something like how I imagine the original cover works, or how I imagine a decksaver would be designed. It turns out that the jacks and speakers mildly trigger my wife’s trypophobia, so I need to do something about that.
As far as sound goes:
The 2600m sounds good, and it feels good too. It feels more premium than the Syntrx (which is a great synth, but the metal panels feel flimsy and I worry about rubbing off the silkscreening). Although the 2600 is more immediate than the Syntrx due to its normaled signal path, more effort and study is required to understand the normaling. I went deep faster with the Syntrx, but expect to discover and learn new things with the 2600.
Much like the Syntrx, the speakers sound surprisingly good for their size.
As far as size goes, it’s a little bit bigger than the Syntrx and is probably the largest soundmaking device I own that isn’t a keyboard. All of the controls are easy to manipulate, I usually wear large men’s gloves. If you have kielbasa fingers, it might be worth chasing down a FS. For everyone else, the m seems like the right size.
The nuts are fine.
I was mildly worried about the PCB mounted jacks, but these jacks don’t require a great deal of force - unlike most of the cheap jacks I used when building Euro modules.
TL;DR: at $1200, the 2600m is a really good value. If you are deeply in love with the 2600, then $2k or more wasn’t unreasonable for this synth. I would have been unhappy if I paid for the LE version and got a silver version of the same case. If I were to gig the 2600 (doubtful), I’d get one of the rolling Pelican cases for it.