Correct, you can find it on page 32.
9.3 WAVE
The WAVE parameter cannot be parameter locked.!
Too bad, but it will push you be creative with sample chains, as you will be able p-lock sample start/end points
Hopefully they will add a soundpool later on, but I doubt that. I think they will keep the soundpools for the more advanced boxes.
Great video from Loopop with Cenk:
Kit replace is cool. Hasnt been there since MD.
It IS fun to swap out a kit on a pattern to hear a different vibe.
Do changes to the kit pass on to following patterns or is it on a per pattern basis like the Digitakt?.
As i understoodā¦its like the MD, a kit saves with a pattern, but you can load a new kit onto an existing pattern. If you reload the pattern the saved kit comes back.
Please correct me if im wrong.
Cenk is the master.
To clarify furtherā¦ Itās different. Itās more like the DT/DN, not the MD (which has a Kit browser, allowing you to associate multiple patterns to a single kit).
M:S / DN / DT = Each pattern has itās own kit, the kit resides in the pattern.
In fact just like in the DN manual, if you search the word āKitā in the M:S manual, no results are found.
Sureā¦i all messed up with the naming. I honestly think they fucked up changing conventions.
BUT you can load a diff set of samples onto an existing pattern on the M:Sā¦yes?
There is no ākit loadā, like we are familiar with.
The implementation is different.
Manual Pg 14
You could also copy and paste a pattern from one pattern slot to another, and that would copy and paste the samples.
But any changes you make to the sample parameters of one pattern wonāt be made to the samples of the other, as they are not referencing the same kit data, each working from a different copy of the kit.
I think this is faster workflow which is what they want for the M:S.
So (i hate saying this dumbass statement butā¦)
Its the sameā¦butā¦different.
Its almost semantics.
heheheā¦ itās āuniqueā
Since Cenk missed so much the scale per track, why didnāt they just put the damn feature in other elektron boxes?
Man! This thing would just make more sales accross the entire lineup. Segmentation is frustration for everybody!! Do it!!!
Is his second of silence after bringing that up any indication of upcoming updates? I wishā¦
Ha, I noticed that too. Like he wanted to say āand all the old boxes will be getting it soon tooāā¦but thought better of it. Fingers crossedā¦
he definitely hesitated didnāt he 
looked to me that he contemplated airing his grievance regarding the other units lack of said ability and then decided against it.
Iām still undecided on the M:S, but knob per function is āhyped?ā Itās just a thing it has. Personally, if Iām trying to manage an OT and A4 live (two pretty complex boxes), it seems to me having a much more streamlined box with knob per function could be very useful and relieve a bit of stress for certain things. Why would I want to add a cheap midi controller when I already know the more midi devices onstage, the more potential problems I could face?
Sure, there are other pieces of gear out there, but this thread aināt about other pieces of gear.
From what I just saw of Cenkās brief workout on the M:S, if you canāt fashion a good set (at least in the percussion department) on this box, the problem aināt the box.
If after checking the M:S feature set you think thereās a better alternative for you. Congrats! Go do that and I look forward to hearing what youāve come up with, truly!
Cenk works for Elektron, they donāt work for him.
That pause looked more like a ptsd flashback that he was almost consumed by.
That was pretty funny 
Maybe that was a very gentle nudge. hehe
I think there could be a little bit of both there.
Almost like a sponsored athlete or something, that would have some input on the product possibly.
