Also uumming and ahhing between this and the Peak, can get the desktop of each for around the same price. I think Hydrasynth excites me more soncially, I watched the Loopop video and some of the tones coming from the Mutators etc. just scream techno. I would probably consider myself more into digital/wavetable/cold sounds rather than fat analogue sounds if push came to shove.
The one thing that is causing me indecision is the control layout… in general I think Hydrasynth looks pretty good to use, not one knob per function obviously but quite logical. However, the wasted use of those knobs on the desktop for arp parameters that you’d rarely change and filter drive really bothers me - there are much more interesting parameters to have “hardcoded”. In particular, I’d really like Filter Env Depth instead of drive as I use this a lot. Tempted to email them and see if they’d ever consider letting you reassign it in firmware!
Is there a quick way to assign macro knobs a bit like the modulation or do you have to scroll through the parameter list? This could go some way to tempting me towards the HS if it can be done in “one touch”…
I don’t have that many knob-per-function synths so part of me leans towards the Peak for this… but I think sonically I’d be more interested in the HS… tough one!
Edit: from their website it looks there isn’t much point asking them if they might change it, haha