Has anyone had any success getting the filter to track the keyboard chromatically?
I had a patch going last night where I had filter 2 in hi-pass mode with a lot of resonance and I was struggling to get it to track the pitch across multiple octaves.
The keytrack goes from around +/-50 i think from memory. What value should I set it to to get the filter frequency to track the keyboard? Is this even possible?
off the top of my head w/o checking 32, and if it is this, why oh why oh why isnāt it one of the detente settings when you hold in function and turn enc - it is an obvious āvanillaā setting - and yes i can get filter tracking to play very nicely, it can be done ! lovely it is too
off the top of my head w/o checking 32, and if it is this, why oh why oh why isnāt it one of the detente settings when you hold in function and turn enc - it is an obvious āvanillaā setting - and yes i can get filter tracking to play very nicely, it can be done ! lovely it is too[/quote]
Agreed, emphatically. It was a mystery to me that this was neither a standard setting nor mentioned in the manual (to my knowledge). I had to crank up the resonance and find it by trial and error.
sorry to come 7 years later with my experience : keytrack 32 is also best setting but it is not acurate at all : two octaves approximate tracking is a maximum! Itās a real shame since tracking is absolutely essential to compensate with high pass resonance weak bass in this machine ā¦ Is analog four MK2 better? Thatās an major improvement customer need. Is it possible to do with a software update?
Thank you darenager. I calibrated (it was warm from the early morning) and Iāve got the same result : 24% deviation in 2 octave. My minilogue doesnāt detune more than 8% in 2 octavesā¦ An improvement would be welcome. And if Elektron plan to make another analog synthesizer, several other controls lack fine adjustment, like PWM, EG attack time (between 0 and 1).
I donāt ever recall having issues getting a broad range of serviceable resonant tones from the Mark 1 with its variable filter (Filter 2) (Filter 1, the ladder has a very narrow usable tracking range by comparison)
Fwiw - I can play 6 octaves of very usable tracked filter resonance on the Mk2 and that was my recollection on the Mk 1 as well - you get at best a jazzy 3 or 4 from the ladder by comparison
Thank you avantronicaā¦ always interesting answers. Really? Maybe my A4 needs update, or serviceā¦ or maybe all A4 donāt provide the exact same F2 accurate trackingā¦ or maybe itās a good reason to change for an A4 MK2.
Ladder tracking is not accurate, at all, but thatās absolutely not a problem for my use.
Using aged ears, the tracking is close enough, I run the filter along with (and without) a lower Tri oscillator and it is usable for me ā¦ No tuners involved
Try a different voice than the one you have ,if youāve not done so already, they can vary (as can our respective tolerances) but in the context of allowing modest tracking for a filter peak it should be more than adequate, I will dig out the MK1 at some point to see if itās as good as I recall
Good advices. I measured with a tuner and all voices give approximately the same result but there is a huge difference among the entire range. Bass frequencies are worst. Third octave has a 20% deviation (between G3 and G4). Octave 4 and 5 are best (12% for 2 octaves). Itās a fantastic tool to subtract or add frequencies to fundamental with resonance, especially in bass frequencies.