Could anyone be Loopop?

Amazing thread already. Popcorn worthy. I always got flagged the few times I hinted that someone was a clown or a troll. But, hey, watch this one get flagged for being off-topic :upside_down_face:

4 Likes

This is still a matter of perspective though. All gear can be useful in the right context and he doesn’t really review anything that would be considered truly awful. That’s more the Bad Gear channel territory, and even he comes around on some products that are considered trash. Magpie can be pretty harsh on gear as well if that’s more your speed.

More like a physical proof he exists. It’s weird that anyone would get offended by this.

2 Likes

Yes, if you’re highly skilled, knowledgeable and have a terrific work ethic. I wish there were more reviewers like him. I don’t mind that he doesn’t show his face since it’s not important. His voice is super corny, imo, but I love the channel regardless lol.

2 Likes

I’m not offended by it (indeed, who would care if I was?) although I would agree that I don’t see how it’s relevant.

1 Like

Of course it’s irrelevant. Most stuff in this thread is irrelevant. In fact, most things in life are irrelevant. We’re just bags of animated meat and bones after all. But you know, it’s fun, it’s sometimes called humour. :wink:

but then companies won’t send you stuff for free to review. It seems a bunch of “toobers” found this out quick and changed theirs tunes. it’s a bs fest for product. a lot of “knob” polishing.

cant watch/listen to any of them anymore, cept’ for Loopop and Tinez AND Nick

edit: fix for accidentally forgetting Nick :man_facepalming:t5:

I think it’s incredibly rare for a piece of gear to be absolute junk these days usually it’s just that it doesn’t have some specific feature that you might want and if you don’t need it then who cares.

Bad Gear is a perfect example. With very rare examples he usually manages to make something half decent out of whatever is put his way even if internet wisdom is that it’s unusable.

Most of the products reviewed by prominent YouTubers are in the hands of them weeks early and any feedback which might result in a bad review has probably been taken into account.

If I try and think of things that have come out recently that have really been total failures then I can’t think of much other than the UNO drum machine with was so glitchy as to be unusable and going back a bit further some of the transitional Akai boxes which were supposedly fairly terrible.

I think Loopop covers this well. He will say “Some people will want this product to do X, if that’s important to you then this isn’t for you” which is all there is to it really.

A synth might have a really limited 8 step arpeggiator, but if you won’t use it then it doesn’t matter.

2 Likes

So the punchline is someone’s complexion, physique, nationality and accent?

2 Likes

Is he like Batman?

Back on topic. I think @stimming and @Tarekith are both pretty good for pointing out problems if anyone wants to get the dirt on a gear’s failings. But Loopop, for me, is great for getting an in-depth overview of a new bit of gear, and he’s gone quite deep with patching ideas for things like the 0-Coast and Moog semi-modulars, for example.

5 Likes

:roll_eyes:

I’m Batman

2 Likes

I been thinking for decades to start a Youtube channel. At least these guys actually do it.

That boat has sailed. Try the new Facebook virtual reality thingy😀

Nah I’m just way too cool for anyone to look at anyway. It’s for the best I guess. :stuck_out_tongue:

The only time Loopop has toys on his desk is when he reviews Teenage Engineering stuff. đŸ«ąđŸ«ŁđŸ€Ș

1 Like

Yeah, the line between serving up a debate and posing bad-faith arguments is thin
particularly in the digital realm.

Would like if we could remember that quite a few of the personalities often brought-up do frequent this forum also. They should feel as welcome as any other user.

7 Likes

“But, doctor,” he sobbed, “I am Loopop!”

3 Likes

:100:

1 Like