Behringer Model D Synth

Common misconception, but no. It is 4-pole.

Well yes, but that’s exactly my point. By taking things that have been done before and using those, you arrive at new things. The development of the TB-303 did not happen in isolation.

IMHO the TB-303 is interesting exactly because the people at Roland tried to make a small bass synth with an integrated step sequencers as simple and as cheaply as possible.

The reason the glide has the same duration regardless of the pitch difference is simply because that’s easier to implement.

EDIT: Oh, and I don’t see what’s special or unique about the accents. Routing velocity to both amp and env had been done plenty of times before and is a rather obvious thing to do if you’re trying to emulate how a bass guitar is played. :slight_smile:

1 Like

Did you made that up or did they really say that in an official statement? I hope they never load Repro-5 and compare it to their “analog” deepmind synth. Could ruin the afternoon.

The discussion about Behringer-D will hopefully calm down a bit when it is released. Maybe it is the cheap analog synth we are waiting for. I´ll give it a chance and look forward to test it at a store.

Behringer cloning digital hardware? pfft dream on… They wouldn’t have a clue unless they magically got a copy of the original source code. That is why I’m guessing we will only see analog hardware clones from them. They’d go bankrupt trying to clone say, a machinedrum :}

1 Like

I know it’s a totally different sound, and I really like the Behringer D sound, but seeing what all I get in my $299 analogue (Korg Monologue) makes me it appreciate it even more: patch memory; an intuitive sequencer with 16 physical buttons, motion sequencing, and p-locks; battery operated; and a keyboard. Crazy what we can get for $299 nowadays.

3 Likes

Do you have any idea how much a modern smartphone would cost if half of the industrial world wasn’t making, and competing making parts for it? The economies of scale are powerful things, way beyond any funds of a mortal.

In IT tech, volumes of sales are 100 000 x bigger than in music gear… these lil facts affect the final prices so much it isn’t even funny.

2 Likes

Some blurps about Moog becoming a cooperative, and then some info on the production of the model D:

-Model D-

5 Likes

I catch your point OM!

Something i like from the Moog DFAM manual:

PRESETS
Please note that your DFAM is 100% analog, and as a result, each unit has subtle sonic differences due to component tolerances that make it unique. This means that two different units set the same way may sound slightly different. This is normal.

I like the this is normal.

6 Likes

yeah its from this recent post https://www.gearslutz.com/board/electronic-music-instruments-and-electronic-music-production/1196469-ub-xa-synthesizer.html that Uli made on gearslutz.

Any Synth that has a ladder filter is cloning Bob Moog’s design including the Analog 4 and many others.

1 Like

Oh my gosh, the possibilities…

5 Likes

That was nice!

1 Like

Gotta admit, seeing a 0-coast next to the boog D gives me some ideas…! SE-02 looking jealously at me right now

1 Like

Not only does it sound awesome on its own but it also has CV which is massive. Build quality is very good too, according to those who have it.

What’s not to like, considering it’s only 350 euros?

1 Like

the shit company making it that has made garbage products for decades and has garbage support to boot?

It’s made by Behringer

Fair enough :rofl:

Somethings Behringer make’s is solid, been that way for a long time now.

2 Likes

After watching a lot more demos, I am for certain getting one of these.
Despite the brand, It’s exactly what I have been wanting, that basic fat moogyness.

1 Like
4 Likes

That thing sounds freaking awesome! Really. I know Moog pretty much as a session player and i can say that this thing sounds awesome and my Digitakt likes it a lot!!
I’ll make some videos :smiley:
27591021_10210273987155300_1043207029_n

3 Likes