I hopefully won’t repeat what others have already said so well. I’ll just chime in a bit with what I usually think about when considering success as an artist.
To me, part of the beauty of making art, any type, is being free to express yourself in whatever manner you choose. To not be accountable to a boss or client. To not worry about what will sell, be popular, etc. So to be independent and have a solid base to continue making your art in the manner you want, for as long as you want, is a powerful thing.
Agreed with earlier posters, “successful” means different things to different people. If I had to come up with a definition, tied to financial success, it would be FU money. If a musician has made FU money, they can make the music they want without listening to anyone’s input/notes/orders. Not dependent on sales to continue. Don’t have to do 24/7 promotion, marketing, social media, etc. Don’t have to schmooze with record industry types.
But it’s funny. Isn’t that kind of like the scene from Office Space? The characters are talking about what they would do if they had a million dollars.
Peter Gibbons: I’d relax, sit on my ass all day, I would do nothing.
Lawrence: Well you don’t need a million dollars to do nothing, man. Just take a look at my cousin, he’s broke, don’t do shit.
Both the millionaire musician and the hobbyist could both theoretically put out the music they want without worrying about financial repercussions. So, if independence is a definition of success for some, then there is more than one way to get there.
Instead of sitting around hoping to win the lottery of financial success and independence through music, I’d rather take the route of getting a solid, somewhat enjoyable and decent-paying job, make music in spare time, be frugal, save and invest like a mutha, figure out what amount you need to live a modest and secure lifestyle, retire early, and then do whatever whenever.
Example:
One more thing. I always get a lot of flack from people for espousing this perspective. It’s nowhere near as cool or glamorous as the starving artist approach. But… the starving artist approach has an expiration date. It might be attractive in your 20’s, maybe your 30’s. But try it in your 40’s, 50’s, or 60’s when your body starts to need more healthcare, or you’re tired of touring, or groupies don’t want anything to do with you after a show, or you can’t find a mate who is interested in someone they have to basically support financially. I know people like this. It’s getting harder and harder for them to coast by on being the cool musician.