Did I use a question mark?
Loading this file in a Single Player machine should produce a “FAILED TO LOAD” error.
1 Like
So here’s where I got to with the OXI E16 definitions.
There’s a parameter limit on each oxiindef file (256 params), so these are split into:
- Base - everything EXCEPT the subtracks
- Subtracks 1-4
- Subtracks 5-8
I structured it this way as I wasn’t using 8 subtracks much. One indef file per page.
Total params in each file are as below - its not possible to combine all params for all 8 subtracks, so you’ll need to cut and paste what you need.
Note: Wavefinder SRC NPRNs do work, but there was a minor issue in 1.31 that broke a couple - I haven’t checked this works for 1.32 yet, but i’ll try to confirm over the weekend.
| File | CC | NRPN | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tonverk-Base | 66 | 30 (nr1=0) | 96 |
| Tonverk-ST1234 | 1 | 196 (nr1=1–4) | 197 |
| Tonverk-ST5678 | 1 | 196 (nr1=5–8) | 197 |
Tonverk-ST5678.oxiindef (35.4 KB)
Tonverk-ST1234.oxiindef (35.4 KB)
Tonverk-Base.oxiindef (16.3 KB)
2 Likes
They actually do, but given the noise, repetition, lack of clarity and impossible suggestions they’re certainly not an easy read … maybe not the most robust method to propose that truly great idea, so yeah the email route is for sure a more guaranteed way to be heard … anyway, FR and bugs topics are definitely monitored periodically
to keep it on topic i’m just bumping this for anyone unaware as it’s kinda buried amongst replies
8 Likes
Ok @mekkimaru this is a 44.1khz 24bit file.
I converted it to 48khz 32bit and could load it. (I should have tried 24 bit but too late !)
2 Likes
Just to be sure 1,3,3 is it ok did nobody run into any problems.
cause for now im stuck a at 1.3.2 as i forgot to back up before upgrading thanks in advance
and please can this thread by clear of bug related issues just to kepp it more topic related thanks
1 Like
So if outbox 8 is planned for june. With overbridge for Tonverk working at release, i have hope that a OS update with overbridge will arrive relatively soon. Can’t wait!
3 Likes
1.3.3 only removed a problematic feature, so I think it can’t be worse…
2 Likes
I am mostly in the same boat. TV is here on my coffe table near sofa. I make some patterns and fun experiment but nothing too serious as I am affraid to lose/break things.
Wait and see
4 Likes
Does it now have timestretch/slicing?
No and these features have never been promised so i would not wait for them to appear. There are some tricks that you can do with the Granier engine to get some kind of timestretch but I think it’s probably better to look at the Digitakt for that kind of thing 
1 Like
Octatrack timestrech is better.
9 Likes
It’s almost wednesday…
3 Likes
And you expect yet another update for Tonverk?
Was there not enough recently? Maybe leave some for DT2 and DN2 
Hahaha, i hear you, but I sold my dt2 and I only have the tonverk left. Tonverk needs it the most though…
3 Likes
Tonverk still has bugs and it still lacks basic features we find on the Digi II (track swap, step rec, euclidean seq, velocity macro, etc…). I also own DNII and it works perfectly fine, it doesn’t need an update.
4 Likes
I also believe DTII “needs” more than DNII.
Sure Tonverk has still a long way to go, but just a little update on the other boxes in the middle of 10 for Tonverk would be appreciated
I assume they’re working on outbox 8 updates ready for a BUG FREE AND STABLE product launch where lots of machines get updates , which will also need a lot of testing to be BUG FREE and STABLE …
5 Likes
Which would mean we get Overbridge for Tonverk, or at least a light version of OB that allows for multichannel audio streaming. That would be absolutely fantastic!
3 Likes
They were looking for betatesters for Tonverk OB recently, so…
3 Likes
I’m ready for waveform zooming and zero point cross locks on the src page.
13 Likes