Commit arps to sequence? Does that sound cool?
3 Likes
Or let us p lock the arp sequence 
1 Like
I donāt understand
You can parameter lock the rate or arp mode but not the actual arp sequence (unless Iām mistaken)
2 Likes
Nah I want randomness when I tell the machine to be random. I do care about this. Itās a 1500$ machine wth. Elektron customers just wait. We pay for waiting. If Iām wrong tell me where I miss the mark.
1 Like
request: FX sends per Subtrack 
2 Likes
Unpopular Request: Timestretching
4 Likes
Some things after giving the Tv some more play:
- an envelope follower
- a resonator
- keytrackable FX parameters
- a parametric EQ āeven if itās just a single bell/notch band
- an Elektron-produced utility for creating emultis and eldrums
- an onboard sample editor (trim / zoom / utility operations)
- per-track swing. Like it would be great to at least ignore global swing on 1/4-time track sequences
- more filter typesāeven if itās just all of the filters developed to-date across all Elektron devices
And Iām not sure if this is possible, but scenes and a crossfader would be incredibly fun.
7 Likes
Iād love to see this feature too and have given it a lot of thought, but Iām honestly not sure how Elektron could actually implement it.
The main issue is that Tonverk tracks are inherently polyphonic, while track FX are strictly monophonic (per track). If you play a chord, which note should the FX keytracking follow? The lowest? The highest? The most recent?
The only other way around this would be making the FX themselves polyphonic (per-voice), but that would completely change the routing and drastically increase the CPU load.
3 Likes
Hapax style midi machines per track for use in the fx slots could be interesting
FX machine that splits frequencies across 2 (or more) busses
3 Likes
Good point.
Could there be a parameter alongside the keytracking amount that decides this? Say lowest note all the way anticlockwise to highest note all the way clockwise? Obviously in that specific example it would neglect note priority or maybe thereās a more elegant way to spread all possibilities across a parameter so you could at least somewhat choose the desired note to follow?
Just spitballing from a place of ignorance mind you, glad to be corrected if thatās unfeasible.
My mind immediately jumps to keytracking distortion which is fairly ungovernable at the best of times so I would be happy with any modulation possibilites even if they werenāt incredibly precise.
Good point! But agree that note priority would be a mighty fine workaround.
More voices more problems indeed.
I would really like to route individual subtracks (in one subtrack) to different busses.
2 Likes
Oh and across all Elektron devices: they need an LFO that runs free BUT starts from the same phase position on transport. Basic basic basic basic.
5 Likes
P-locking the phase position on the very first trig doesnāt do the job? Maybe yellow trig with a first only condition.
A record mode on the TV that I can arm for midi capture from external gear, that starts when receiving external transport.
If the Degrader isnāt gonna be Fixed for acurate beat repeats can the you guys add a ON Step Fill Option to be able to do things on a Playing Step from the step itself. A fill that doesnāt mute the step.!.. A Parameter Fill. A normal step with Parameter Fillā¦ a fill without duration just as long as I want to hold it. Pretty Please !!!
2 Likes
I agree, this is super useful.
On other devices you can set lfo trig to off, turn it onā¦ on step 1 ( eg conditional trig first ) .
I also though it started its cycle when pressing play
I also think tonverk lfoās are setup like other machines ā¦ yet ( hopefully )
Only question is . With more lfoās will I be able to select which are on / off etc .