He had the Digitakt first. I’ve had the DT and swapped it for the OT. The workflow is just put into a more compact and instant fashion for it’s included features, otherwise for myself, when I switched/transitioned, had both for the first bit with the OT, and I do have to say the beauty of the Elektron workflow isn’t it’s similarity between the two, as it’s a “modular” workflow across all of their major machines, so there are additional features on the OT, and so with it more “parts”, comes just more to learn in the menu system of the OS.
It’s not complex, but when you use more features, tie them together, then you have more layers, and steps in order to do something, and thus a more complex approach. But I run my OT just like I operated on the DT, I have my “workflow” mastered on the OT and now I take advantage of the additional features I am interested in using on the OT. So for me, as someone who really never liked menu systems on music gear, generally my synths, but for the production side, as for hardware it’s my whole bag in production and I wanted despite the extra investment of learning/time all the OT / Elektron has to offer for the long haul. DT is great to figure out if you want to do things that way, OT is when you say, I’m in and I’m ready for the whole pie.