Tascam has a lot of good stuff on the market right now. I won’t be buying this anytime soon as I very recently picked up a dp32sd on the cheap and there are other things more immediately demanding of my meager gear budget (and I assume this won’t be cheap) but it could be a someday purchase for me. It does seem a bit niche seeing as it makes the most sense for someone with a larger mixing situation but I’m in that niche. It’s too bad I sold my db25 cabling but they’re easy to make.
Also love that it can be rack mounted!
The disappointing thing about the Model series to me is that the inputs are hardwired to the tracks unlike something like the old 388 where any mixer channel can feed any tape track. It’s more suited to someone tracking bands, or if you do your dawless hardware stuff all live and don’t do any overdubs. It’s not really the solution for someone with a lot of instruments that they want to leave plugged in all of the time, but who might want to overdub multiple layers of a particular instrument.
I use a Cymatics Utrack for this same purpose, it’s an essential part of my studio, was cheap even new (although you have to factor in the cost of the DB25 snakes).
They’ve since been discontinued and the 2nd hand price has gone silly. This could fill a hole in the market.
Holy shit this is what I’ve been wanting tascam to make for years. If you can run tracks out to mixer/effects and then record that back onto another track then I’ll definitely get one of these.
Yeah, this answer makes so much sense!
This was also a big discussion when the SSL SiX came out, the DB-25 is more for studio’s i guess?
I also own the SiX (witch also got the 25DB IO) It makes the Studio Bridge more apealing for me I think. I guess i’m a pro-sumer, one who rather saves a bit more money and get some quality gear.
(as far I can be a judge of that)