START issue?

I’ve noticed that adjusting START on trigs doesn’t really give much more than a subtle change. I’ve also noticed this on the LFO page as well.

For instance, if I select a bunch of trigs, all with widely ranging start points, it doesn’t appear to do very much, with start points being quite close to the original start point.

With a random lfo I would expect it to have a random starting point on each trig, but again this seems minimal.
Wh
As usual, my assumption is that it’s a user issue and not the machine.

Can anyone confirm that it’s me not doing something, or is it meant to be this way.

Are you adjusting the depth?

1 Like

Haha yeah. Maybe my expectation is very different to the reality. Just seemed like it should be really different each time it restarts.

On random, if I want a great effect I set the lfo pretty deep and that works for generating random start points. I generally mess with start points on longer samples so that there is a noticable difference as its running.

3 Likes

great tip. thanks. ive been playing for the first time today with this plus the micro timing going through a zoom cdr70 on varying settings - so deep.

Hmm this is exactly what I am wanting to do, but am not getting the results. I’ll persevere

Presume you have lfo set to hold also, so that each trig sets a random value and holds until the next trig?

1 Like

Nope. Had it on trig and assumed that it’ll trigger on each new trig… Now you’ve said that, it makes more sense to me!

1 Like

Trig just syncs it to note ons (with speed), hold is your new best buddy!
Enjoy the outcome!

4 Likes

Nice one. I knew it was me!

1 Like