Roland system 8

Looks aside, if you want an allround good sounding synth with that Roland character, high polyphony and multitimbrality, go for the Jupiter-X.

If you want faithful emulations of the classic Roland synths, with a more in your face analog sound and care more for the little details in the sound than high polyphony, go for the System-8.

Also, JP-X has more modulation options and a deeper synth engine in general, but also a lot of menu diving. The S-8 has almost no menu diving, but is more limited in sound design options.

2 Likes

Can you store more patches on the JP-X?

Love the idea of the System8, but I’d need more than the 64 patches. Ideally at least 500 user patches.

1 Like

I really appreciate both of the above responses. So I have a JU-06A and a JP-08. I’ve side by sided to JU-06A and SH-4D and while I can hear slight differences, by the time I put those sounds in to the 404 or in to the mix over all, those slights disappear, at least to my ear. If I got the Jupiter-X I could see myself getting rid of the SH-4D down the road. But with the System 8’s lack of multitibrality I imagine I’d end up using both. Sorry for the rant. I’m trying to think through all my options.

I’m curious how the keybeds compare on the two. Also, do either receive PolyAT?

I had the System 8 for a minute a few years ago. I will echo what others have said about it sounding fantastic, but I found the build quality to be underwhelming for the price, and that bothered me enough to eventually sell it.

2 Likes

This seems like a decent comparison video between the System 8 and Jupiter-X.

2 Likes

This is a question as old as Roland. Do I really need a Juno when a sample-based JV-1080 sounds close enough and gives me way more sounds and polyphony?

Now ZEN-Core is the inheritor of the JV legacy and ACB plays the role of limited-but-amazing-sounding analog. Which will win? Only you can say, and historically there’s been no wrong answer. People have made great music with both JVs, Junos, and their modern software equivalents for decades.

So I’d be tempted to look at the problem in terms of host capabilities:

What devices can host more or less complete ZEN-Core setups?

  • MC-101
  • MC-707
  • Jupiter-X
  • Jupiter-Xm
  • Juno-X
  • Various stage pianos, workstations, and keytars.

What devices can host ACB PLUG-OUTs?

  • System-8

That’s basically it unless you don’t care about the Juno-60, Juno-106, Jupiter-8, Jupiter-4, JX-3P, and System-8 (which is no slouch). In which case you can add Sytem-1 and System-1m to the list (FANTOM-EX can also now play a set of ACBs, but workstations are kind of their own thing).

So you have way more options when it comes to ZEN-Core. And honestly I’d be tempted to get something small from low end the range (MC-101) just to cover the bases there. Then go System-8 for the big, hands-on-control keyboard, because that’s the only way ACB is available now anyway.

1 Like

Do you think Roland is ever going to make more ACB PLUG-OUT capable devices or is it a technological dead end?

Honestly if the System 8 had more polyphony, was multitimbral, and less importantly a better keybed, I’d grab that instantly. I do even like how it looks.
The Jupiter-X feels like the last Roland synth I’d buy for quite some time, which I guess is what a flagship is kind of for.

Edit: Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful reply! Adds some good perspective.

1 Like

I wouldn’t say it’s a dead end. Hardware-wise they launched AIRA with it. Then used it in the Boutiques. And they just added it to the FANTOM line. And some parts of the AIRA Compact boxes use it.

On the software side, Roland Cloud is built off the back of it. They just made an ACB version of the Jupiter-4 within the last year or two. The 606, too, I think? For the TR-8?

But it seems the chips needed to run these detailed emulations in stand-alone hardware are not cheep (even the gutsy FANTOMs can only run one ACB instrument at a time). And the current market is not particularly kind to expensive synths. We already see how much they had to cut costs on the 8 with its all plastic construction and no aftertouch.

They could cut out the keyboard and chassis all together and do a rack version. But what would differentiate that from a PC running the plugins? My gut says unless they can source a much cheeper chip for all that ACB processing, this is all we’ll see as far as PLUG-OUT goes for a while.

It’s cool. Roland moves in these cycles. They abandon analog for digital, and then abandon the digital for the nostalgia of analog again, playing the hits before doing something new. We’re very much in the digital era of ZEN-Core right now. There’s an ACB revival on the horizon somewhere.

3 Likes

SY-08 Boutique on the way? Haha!
*4 note polyphony

2 Likes

System 1 & 1m could be that and they could include 4-note poly versions of the others.

2 Likes

IMO think about the intended use cases … :wink:

Using both - System-8 (ACB) and MC-707 (Zen) I would say:

  • Zen is more flexible, has more sound-design options
  • ACB is closer to the orignal analogue instrument
  • soundwise both are great

But can we hear the difference - particularly in a mix?

For me getting the System-8 was not to pay high prices for a vintage synth but gettin something very close to the original Jupiter-8.

Later I got the Zen-Technology because of its many features for sound-design.

1 Like

How ā€˜safe’ is it to buy a used System 8 where licensing is concerned.

Meaning: if I buy a used one and want to expand it but it’s been registered to someone else, can I expand it.

ā€œI don’t knowā€ is a completely acceptable answer, lol

Yeah a shame the 1m couldn’t do poly on the plugouts but I guess system 8 also just does mono on the mono plugouts?

If i recall correctly, any plug outs you purchase are directly tied to your Roland cloud account, not the unit itself.

2 Likes

Pretty safe.

Any plug outs installed on the unit you can use for as long as you keep them on there. They don’t phone home or anything.

You can also remove or replace them regardless of whose account they’re tied to.

I think the Jupiter-8, Juno-106, and JP-3X are part of the firmware, now. So you ought to always be able to get those on there regardless of what you own.

1 Like

Thanks, all.
I’m going to look at a used one on the way home today and see just how ā€˜used’ it is. Condition is listed as excellent.

I’ve been longing for some ā€˜classic’ Roland synth sounds on a hardware unit shaped like a synth and controllable like a synth. I enjoy interacting with synths almost as much as making actual songs. (doubt I’m alone here from time to time).

It’s sort of a ā€˜gap’ in my palette, I think.

I don’t care about how genuine they are as long as they’re in the ballpark and sound good. Being a perfect emulation of something has never been a ā€˜thing’ for me personally.

If it goes well, it goes home with me :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Good luck! I almost went and looked at a used one last week.

On paper it should tick all your boxes. I love mine

It does indeed.
There’s a part of me that wants a Juno X, which if there’s another sale on I can get for around 300 more than this will be… it just LOOKS so classic Roland.

I guess that’s the only box that sort of not ticked.

But I don’t need 61 keys, and it’s really about the sound. I’ll see how my first 30-second impression of the 8 is. I’ve never seen one before in person.

1 Like