Reliq Matrix Mixer

I second this. It’s not only about adding stuff just for the sake of it, but to keep such a powerful machine coherent and easy to use it’s not an easy task I guess.

Personally I think that a way to send midi infos between tracks internally would greatly expand the Hapax possibilities, but I’m more than happy with all the things it can do now, and I especially like its own flow. There’s not much gear that you can put aside for prolonged times and be proficient in no time when you decide to fire it up again.

4 Likes

DEV Update:
Hey @everyone, We hope you’re all doing well and easing into winter.
This past month has been a very different one for Reliq. With the hardware side finally settling after the long push of the Indiegogo campaign, we were able to shift most of our attention toward software. After a small delay during testing, we’re really happy to share that
Rlx 1.3.0 is now live.
It’s the second major consecutive update in our monthly cycle. The biggest shift in 1.3.0 is the introduction of Track Modes and the first pieces of the Track Generator system.
These modes form the backbone to move Reliq beyond a pure control powerhouse into a new generative layer, opening space for more exploratory, inspiration-driven workflows. This update also brings several community-requested features and fixes, including MIDI Clock Input, LFO S&H, and a number of workflow refinements across sequencing, modulation, and DAW control.
Rlx 1.3.0 — Overview
• New Track Modes: Free, Melody, Chord
• New Chord Piano Roll with full voicing control
• New Chord Picker for shapes, inversions, and extensions
• LFO Sample & Hold (per-note sampling)
• External MIDI Clock Input
• Optional USB Host Start/Stop transport control
• Quick Solo & Mute
• New DAW clip shortcuts (Stop/Delete DAW clips in Live/Bitwig)
• Follow-up chaining for LFO/ENV slots
• Encoder reset shortcut (Shift + Encoder)
• Many fixes and refinements (note-off on mute, looping at divisions, CV pitch bend, matrix group updates, virtual keyboard contrast, and more)

You can install 1.3.0 through Reliq Updater. Updated Ableton and Bitwig integration files are available on the support page as well.

Looking ahead, the next update is already underway. We’re already working on Drum Mode, Instrument Definitions, CV Automations, and a few other things we’re excited about but not ready to spoil just yet. Thank you again for all your feedback, questions, ideas, issue reports, and experiments. They really do shape how Reliq grows every month. We hope you enjoy Rlx 1.3.0, and we can’t wait to share what’s coming next!

6 Likes

Ratchets. Where’s the bloody ratchets? :grinning:

Am excited to get Reliq, it should arrive in January!
I did buy a Hapax for the second time a few months ago, and although Hapax is great and has progressed tremendously since I sold my first unit in 2023, the things that I wanted from the earlier use I had in 2022 are still not developed into the OS; these are 16 drum lanes and nested filing for midi files.
Squarp have been open about this and it doesn’t look like they will implement these things anytime soon, if at all, so Reliq will no doubt be the answer for me.
The fact that the Reliq dev is rapidly implementing everything I’m currently needing in the next 1-2 months, and that its UI is infinitely better equipped than Hapax, is just more to be excited about. Reliq is possibly still 6-12 months away from catching up with the rest of Hapax’s long list of recently implemented cool functionality, but that’s no problem for me, and no doubt because of the better UI and larger screen, these functions will be easier to use with less of the menu diving involved in Hapax.

Well done Kyriakos from Reliq!

Also, much respect to the Squarp team, as they have done a great job with Hapax!

Please please please, when you’ve used your Reliq for a while, could you post your thoughts on how Reliq compares to Hapax?

I love my Hapax… there are certain limitations though and I’m interested to know if Reliq would be an upgrade.

Anyone know if the 8 MIDI CC’s-per-track limit for automation will be increased on the Reliq?

1 Like

To me, the number one advantage of the Reliq over the Hapax (or any other sequencer I can think of) is the matrix mixer. And that’s huge if you do modular. But really only if you do modular.

Imagine using a sequencer to not only to store and play back gates and CVs, but also your patch itself. No more taking photos of your cable spaghetti. Instant reconfiguration in the middle of a song. That’s the kind of stuff the matrix mixer allows — at least for your 16 most cherished ins and outs. And that feels pretty game changing?

But honestly, outside of modular, it’s kind of a pain in the butt. The breakout box is tiny, light, and has its jacks really close together. 3.5mm to ¼" cables tend to be bigger and heavier than patchers, and fitting them all in is not great feeling. And the weight kind of physically overwhelms the box. Plus a good ⅔ of the box is dedicated to CV and Gate outs… so sort of feels like wasted space to non-modular folks like me.

A 19" rack mount breakout with ¼" jacks would go a long way to making this feel better for non-modular stuff, IMHO. But that’s not in the short term plans at least, I guess. And I was kind of hoping I could use Reliq in a non-modular context as a mixer with, like, 16 auxes. But alas, there’s no way to control the “send amount” of the matrix routings. Each connection point either transmits all the given input to the given output or none.

Which, again, makes perfect sense when you think of it as “automated patch cables” for your eurorack (patching also always send either all or none of the signal between two ports :slight_smile: ). But the result feels more like “16 busses” than “16 auxes”. And I just don’t need that many group tracks.

So between the breakout being a pain, the mixer not really doing anything for me, and the Reliq itself being gigantic, it’s been hard for me to really dive deep into the sequencing bits. What I’ve experienced is fine. And the screens and graphics are legit beautiful (the whole product, with the exception of the flimsy-feeling breakout box, feels really top notch and premium). It’s just always physically easier to use the Hapax when I need something, so that’s what I do.

To emphasize, I really feel like I’m not the target audience for this thing. Thus my take is pretty different from people who use it for what it’s meant for (there are lots of them over on the Reliq forums). If you’re into modular, those folk will be a better resource to you.

On the other hand, I know many people here have a setup like mine. So if I’m not the target audience, maybe you aren’t either? If so, hope this saves you some heartache.

8 Likes

I, for one, appreciate your insights on the Reliq. I decided to go ahead a pre-order the Reliq just to get it at a discounted early bird price. I have a feeling that once production ramps up, the price will go up as well. That said, I’m geniunely hoping that between now and January (when my Reliq is scheduled to ship) Squarp puts out a press release that blows me away. Because if their next announcement is a big as I’m hoping it will be, I’ll cancel the order for the Reliq immediately.

I’m just hoping if the Squarp team releases a Hapax mk2 (my current speculation) they don’t double the size to add 8 additinoal rows for the drum sequencer. I have limited desk real estate and the size of the Hapax is one of the reasons I would prefer it to the Reliq. I’m cool with adding 8 additional drum tracks, but I hope it’s just a “Page 1, Page 2” approach (assuming my speculation is correct).

2 Likes

Hey, yes, I’ll certainly post some views once I get my head around it. I’ll keep both Hapax and Reliq until I know which one I’ll finally settle with.
Re: CC limit, if you join the Reliq Discord server you’ll no doubt get a quick answer there, everyone is super responsive and helpful.

1 Like

Sounds like you’re more like me in the non-modular territory. I’ll give it a go as definitely like the 16x16 grid idea over the 8x16 grid on the Hapax - I have a good amount of space, so the size won’t be an issue for me.

If I don’t like it then I’ll just keep the Hapax and sell it on.

1 Like

I guess 2026 will be an exciting year for external sequencer advancement!

2 Likes

I’m in the atonal camp which is why I got so frustrated by the Oxi and how you had to scroll up and down. Would be nice to have the whole chromatic scale in one view with a fast way to go up and down octaves. Will keep an eye on this

Serious need for rack ears, though. This and the TR-1000

Not sure if the TR-1000 would work so well in a rack as the sides are not flat, they are slightly tapered, so you’d need a fitting to square off the sides before being able to set it in a rack - maybe this has been done before with other similarly shaped gear.

The Reliq would be great in a rack. They are developing a VESA mount for it at the moment, so it could sit in a floor standing mount with wheels, or on a desktop mounted monitor swing arm

1 Like

Any reason for speculating on a mkii or just your personal wish? :wink:

If you do, please post your thoughts.

I’m not into modular either, I wouldn’t even use the breakout box.

I do think that the Reliq has massive potential as a sequencer though. The larger pad layout, the large screen, many controls etc.

Also, as they are a company that only makes and has to code for one product, that will hopefully help for the speed of the Reliq’s development.

I’m excited to see where they take it, and whether it eventually surpasses the Hapax as a hardware sequencer.

2 Likes

I really feel that both the Reliq and the Erica Synths Matrix Mixer are rather matrix patchbays (well, the one from Erica offers three different levels for every connection, which puts it somewhere in the middle). Still a cool thing, but not a mixer.

1 Like

A little bit of both, actually . . .

About a month ago, one of Squarp’s devs left and in his farewell post said: “There’s still a lot of exciting stuff in the works at Squarp HQ, so keep your eyes peeled for things to come”. Since it’s been about 2 years since the last major firmware update for the Hapax, I’m hoping this means that perhaps a new sequencer is in the works.

Also, they’ve already updated their other two products, the Hermod and (back in September) the Rample. So I’m wondering if the Hapax is next.

1 Like

What could they change or improve?

Apart from velocity sensitive pads, the hardware is fine.

Also, there have been substantial updates in the past 2 years, and another helpful update is coming at some point.

1 Like

Looking at last major Hapax firmware releases, I’m not seeing any kind of slow down, especially since there were 2 good dot releases this year, but losing one of their key devs is going to have an impact for sure. Maybe he left to work on Reliq? :wink:

  • Hermod+OS 2.00: February 2025
  • RampleOS 2.00: February 2024
  • HapaxOS 2.00: January 2004

As for the hardware revisions, they did quite a few on pyramid, every 2 years or so (and there were global supply chain issues), but Hapax is a more mature product, so I’m not sure they would want to support another version. Let’s see :slight_smile:

100% mirrors my experience. We didn’t have all the info during the crowdfunding campaign and there some possibilities left open for a while, but as it stands, it’s a better companion to a modular system than one which would require a digital patchbay like the Xpatch.

1 Like

Oh no, here we go again . . . :rofl:

It seems to me that what makes an update “substantial” is subjective. The Hapax sequencer still does not have groove templates, the ability to set min and max CC values for modulation (which should be a given), the drum sequencer desperately needs updating (only 8 tracks, no modulation per track, no length per track, no direction per track, etc), and no new generative sequencers (Arpoly and Register are more MIDI FX than full on sequencers).

The Oxi One mk2 is what I would consider a “substantial” update: adding 4 tracks, adding an accumulator, adding a groove template, a major revision of the Euclidean sequencer (with more to come), and a complete remodeling of the arranger just to name a few. I haven’t seen an update of this magnitude with the Hapax since version 2 was first released. Adding MIDI import/export of drum files and a few new MIDI FX is not what I consider “substantial”. All the other updates were either general bug fixes or amendments/fixes to the aforementioned MIDI FX. There was an update to improve CPU efficiency maybe a year ago? But it’s not for me to decide if others think these are “substantial” updates.

Yes, this is a good point and one that I’ve considered. I’ve seen a few others besides myself on other forums speculate that Squarp could be working on a new hardware version of the Hapax. But I realize that this view is very much in the minority. Still, I’m very excited to see what Thibault was talking about. He said “a lot of exciting stuff” and used the word “things”, plural. So it’s not just one firmware update. I have other speculations, but this isn’t a Squarp thread . . .

And just so I don’t completely go off topic, the Reliq devs announced that the new drum sequencer is coming either this month or next. Besides the generative sequencing engine, this is the update I am most curious about. I imagine that it will offer multiple modulation lanes per drum track, something missing from both the Oxi One and Hapax.