Hey there, I have recorded a bunch of 64 step loops of patterns with long releases (sample of steps 1-64 for first trig, sample of steps 65-129 for clickless looping on every further trig). This makes for clickless loops, but fills up my sample slots quite fast. Thinking of two solutions and am thankful for suggestions:
- Recording a 128 step loop via internal recording of sequenced sample 1-64 followed by sample 65-129. Then setting the loop of the newly recorded 128 step sample to steps 65-129 in SRC/AED. Should make for a clickless loop?
Problem for playback then can be that I have to mess with scale settings to play back this loop. When using methods for recording longer loops by messing with scale (as explained above by @sezare56, DN/DT patterns can break, I assume mostly due to delay/reverb time settings. Or am I missing something with scale settings on OT + DN/DT for playing back 128 step patterns? - Ideal way seems to me to make a longer recording of all of the âpattern A steps 1-64 + steps 65-128, pattern B respectively etc.â which I could then slice according to patterns and set the loops to steps 65-129 within each slice. What would be the best way to make such a recording only using OT and no DAW? Setting up steps and then make an internal recording with ~ infinite scale settings which I can then assign as a flex/static sample? Or is there a way to merge several saved static/flex samples into one long sample without having to use the recorder?
If there are any other good options, let me know.