Intellijel Jellymix makes me envision a toothpaste you’d see on the shelf at the store. Every time. I know I’ve said it before in this forum, I feel strongly about this.
There was a takeout joint near us in Bed-Stuy called Fish & Amp Chips. It’s still there, you can look it up on Google Maps. I’m convinced that at some point, someone cut “Fish & Chips” out of an HTML email and pasted it into a text field or something, during the ordering of the sign, because in HTML it’s “Fish & Chips”. But that’s probably me overthinking it.
[Edit: heh, I had to work to get that last quote to come out right, apparently the Discourse editor does not sanitize as cleanly as I thought.]
There’s something very “old school Japanese corporate” about it. Casio. Yamaha.
Korg did it too in the pre-Tats era. Wasn’t their old digital drum machine the DDD-1? Nowadays they’re more the sib who colors outside the lines, so they’re not afraid of names…
Roland of course is the fuckup of that corporate family. They try to end their products with numbers, but every number is “1” (except when it’s a tribute product with a “3,” “8,” or “9.”) They can never quite get anything right. Even some of their greatest products are mistakes…
Something about the way the big Japanese brands do letter/number combos always drives me crazy.
After making the Jupiter 4 and Jupiter 8, which have 4 and 8 voices, Roland releases the Juno 6, Juno 60, and Juno 106, which all have six voices. And they’re all supposed to have a hyphen, which is conventional for abbreviations with numbers (TR-808) but there’s no tradition at all of noun-number hyphenation (Juno-106).
Casio’s CZ series was numbered as (checks notes) the CZ 101, CZ 230s, CZ 1000, CZ 2600s, CZ 3000, CZ 5000. At least with those, there’s a loose connection between the larger number and more polyphony…until the CZ 1, which has the highest voice count of all.
And that’s not even getting into the nightmare of Yamaha’s naming conventions, or the general misery of trying to scan catalogues for digital pianos that aren’t Nord.
Had to do some soul searching on this recently as I was coming up with a new alias for an upcoming album. Had discussions with a few people and landed on no punctuation at all.
So the album/artist is going to be “plus pro” (probably all lower case like that, but will have another soulsearch about that).
I considered plus/pro and +/pro. The + will still feature prominently in artwork, but not in the written name for the sake of reasonable metadata and searchability. We decided against any special characters for that reason.
Maybe I can use that / down the line for future artwork.