OT - sound quality

1 Like

Id rather play with OT but it just sounds too bad! :joy:

I would not want to convince you or anyone to like it.
Bad sounding in your opinion, which is just that an opinion, not backed up with a single example.
I’d actually really love to hear a sample that the OT can’t capture accurately, because I have heard so many people talk about it yet not one example……

If you said ā€œI don’t like the sound of the Octatrack or its fxā€ that is very different than ā€œthe Octatrack sounds bad because the converters are cheapā€ one is an opinion, one is an ill informed statement.

4 Likes

No. I already said that the converters are good enough.

It’s the processing, the software part!

That’s great dude. :+1:t6:

2 Likes

Funny about these conversations, that somehow in the back of my mind it make me think. Do I need to develop a new hardware sampler by myself…

So are you saying that you think the OT captures samples well enough, but that you don’t like the sound of the processing?

1 Like

Yes

Maybe there the possibility your OT is broken. You need to play your files back from another OT.

1 Like

I see, did you not listen to any demos of it before purchasing it?

You expected to get a sampler and decent efx for less than half the cost of a decent efx unit?

What?! What decent efx box costs 2700 euros?

I did! I thought it was a user error //or a small pool of examples

Things like air, space, clear, clean and accuracy are important to me. Everyone is listening to other monitoring and audio interface set-ups. Online examples doesnt say that much this way. There has to be a guideline of reference to make it so.

Any decent efx…Eventide, Bricasti…what do you consider decent efx? Now I’m not so sure you know what sounds good or not, I was leaning your direction on this topic. Only effects I use is Eventide Orville, so I can’t compare to anything else.

Actually 1200 Euros (or 1300 - 1400 with tax depending where you are).

1 Like

Well, there’s your problem, cause those are mutually exclusive. :clown_face:
The first one is actually necessary for sound waves to travel.
The second one is a place where sound doesn’t exist.
Also, one is inside the other… :thinking:

I’ll let myself out now…

6 Likes

This comparison makes no sense to me! You can find free vst efx that sound really good and some cheap ones sound excellent! I understand that a 10 yrs old dsp chips can’t handle everything but the efx algos, (mainly?) the time stretch and pitch shifting and really bad imo

I know! But he said ā€œhalf the priceā€ …so double the price of OT

Ahh ok, my maths is not very good, almost as bad as my hearing :wink:

1 Like