I was feeling guilty about some comments I made earlier on this thread…about being able to tolerate only a few moments of most music posted on this forum. So I decided to listen to the entirety of the next audio link I clicked on.
I’m not trying to go after anyone personally. There were some nice things about the song. It was well produced. I liked the sounds used. What bothered me was how typical the song was in its overarching structure. I use the word overarching in a literal sense. One big arch, spanning the length of the piece. If I heard that overarching form for the first time, I would probably think it was the coolest thing ever. But for the thousandth time?
Start the song out with ambiguous rhythm, add the drums in at some point, layer, layer-more, keep layering. Do something in the middle that might be called a bridge, though it sounds suspiciously like the rest of the song. Near the end of the piece pull away a bunch of layers, returning to a state of ambiguity much like the beginning of the piece. The song ends with the musical equivalent of contemplating one’s navel.
Whenever I complain about the quality of techno music, someone comes to the community’s defense by telling me that the music isn’t being produced to please ME. Absolutely! I wish, however, that more of the music sounded like it was written solely to please the artist. Because so much of it sounds like it’s written to please OTHERS through the use typical forms and techniques.