I remember having read somewhere that counterclockwise mk2 was clockwise mk1 circuit.
I really like both mk2 overdrives. Love how you can change the sound in so many ways, when filter resonance is high or very modulated.
Counterclockwise : mkI
Clockwise : mkII
I often prefer Counterclockwise.
Same here bcs its smoother and more suitable for the sounds I’m after but its nice to have a quite aggressive one too, and on the same dial, interesting things happen when modulating it so that its alternating between them.
What is your source? A4 mkl has also 2different distortion models I would say
Absolutely.
Another A4 = DFAM one (on one track, of course)
Source please !
2 different overdrive circuits ?
Oposite settings with MKII negative and MKI positive seem to sounds similar indeed, a bit short to compare though…
An Elektron official source ?
Didn’t they just inverted knob behavior or is it just more…mature ?
A4MKI manual :
OVR (Filter1 Overdrive) introduces distortion in the signal path. In mid position (0) the signal is kept clean. Increasing positive values gives a clipping distortion after Filter 1. Increasing negative values also distorts the signal, but with a softer overdrive inside the filter.
Same description in MKII manual but in Cuckoo’s demo it seems inverted (positive values softer).
Something wrong in the manual ?
OVR (Filter1 Overdrive) introduces distortion in the signal path. In mid position (0) the signal is kept clean. Increasing positive values gives a clipping distortion after Filter 1. Increasing negative values also distorts the signal, but with a softer overdrive inside the filter.
So you’re telling me I have 4 DFAMs… on my A4… on top of my double DFAMs… no freakin wayyyyyyyy. I remember giving it a go once but this is motivating.
I couldn’t find a statement by an Elektron employee anywhere on the forum. However, many well-informed users of MkI and MkII describe precisely these differences in the overdrive behaviour between the two Marks. Perhaps MkII beta testers were provided with some extra information?
@eangman
Is the description of the overdrive in the AF MkII manual correct, or was that text simply copied from the MkI manual?
I read this as saying that the difference is overdrive before or after the filter, which would make sense as an option. Am I interpreting that right?
Why is that? What’s the matter with the 5 sub? The waveform of the square?
sounds extremely close to the signature dfam stuff!
After the filter vs “inside” the filter…
Maybe, but it’s not very clear imho…
Let’s say you want to play a C4 with its 5th, G. Normally, on the same octave, G4 is 7 semitones above, and on the octave below G3 is 5 semitones below.
A4 uses 7 semitones below, for me it’s a fourth (F3).
A workaround to get a fifth (above) is to increase osc by 7 semitones, C4 become G4, F3 become C4, and now you have a fifth with C as root note.
On the second osc you can increase osc by 10 semitones (with 5th sub on), and you get a Cm7 chord.
Chart for making chords with osc's - #7 by sezare56
Thanks for that explanation! That makes sense!
Will try to experiment with your chart;-)
I love the combination of my A4, my Heat and my iPhone or iPad.
A4 -> ah
ah is sound card for iPad
I use Loopy Pro, with fab filter and have perfect compressor, filters, volume control and looper.
Now I have more ‘stage-ready’ sound, and a looper for transition.
Do you do it this way with the transistor pulse or with the regular pulse wave?