Long story short: if I was frustrated by the buttons and UI of the Rytm MKII, would I be frustrated with the original Rytm too, or would you all suggested giving it a try?
I bought an MKII earlier this year, but was really put off by the complexity, screen menus that looked similar but behaved differently, and weird button UI.
But the more I think about it, the more I miss the sequencer and sound of it. Looking at the original Rytm, it looks more streamlined and simple. E.g. the buttons above the pads and below the knobs look more rational and clearly labeled. But maybe it’s just less accessible and requires more menu-diving?
For the record, I’m not too interested in live performance and fancy pad-jamming and knob twiddling. More into having a solid programmable drum machine with good sounds.
My thinking is maybe the MKI was what the Rytm was designed to be…and the MKII was trying to simultaneously do the same thing but also be more, which made it awkward. But maybe not. Thoughts?