A pal of mine might loan me his Analog Rytm mk2 - will be interested to know if the FX on that compare to AH FX. Perhaps its incorrect to assume the newer unit will have ‘better’ FX
No firsthand experience with the AH (aside from the same ballpark of distortion circuits in other pedals), but I’d say that for a digital distortion the DT2’s track and master overdrives surprised me with their excellent quality, and sound better to me than DT1. DT2 can do proper sidechain compression (thru per track routing options).
AHFX has the analog distortions and filters and I remain jealous of its envelope follower as a programmable modulation source…
Big difference.
DT2 inputs have no insert fx like his audio tracks. Only fx sends to delay/rev/chorus. (Can benefit from compressor and master od)
AH overdrives/distortions are very clean compared to usual pedals, very different from Analog Drive btw.
Yes, this and other modulations (lfos, envelopes with a threshold trigger).
So AH+FX is much more capable compared to DT2, but it lacks a sequencer. A way to control the trigger via midi is cruelly missing, I am waiting for that since AH MKI. Possible only with CV, in a reliable way.
Syntakt is really interesting too, fx parameters can be sequenced with FX track, which have analog drive and filters.
Analog Four too.
I think the best Elektron Fx machine is Octatrack.