So one side is capable of saying this is all inevitable, but the other side doesn’t have enough evidence to point to why it’s bad? The ironic thing is that the reality is the opposite. Of course we can claim it’s worse for the world, we’re seeing evidence in real time.
An example of a person experiencing a benefit through the technology doesn’t address the point that it is “vastly more harmful to everybody”. I use gas to get to work. Gas does shitty things to the world in more ways than one. Gas still benefited me in getting to work. If I were blind enough, I could take a step back and claim “wow gas has played a part in all of my success in my career because it got me there.”