Entanglement space is a quad 32bit operation DSP effects processor featuring 64 algorithms focused on highly experimental topologies.
Each processor core stores 16 algorithms that can be entangled with other core programs to create your own complex algorithms / spectral palettes for the stereo field or quadraphonic space.
Accompanying the 64 algorithms are 12 modulators with time complicating attenuation for use of control voltage over 6 differential parameters of each of the 64 algorithms, 4 voltage controlled gates and a 4 input - pan directional mixer with stereo out.
Each processor core has individual in and out via banana and quarter inch formats, allowing complex routing for introducing feedback and multi instruments to be routed through entanglement.
Entanglement space algorithms interpolate between pitch shifting and warping, amplitude modulating, spectral reverbs, ring mod delays, feedback delay network phasers and through zero reverb flanging time based effects.
Well i think of the Zoia Euroburo but … well you tell me. I don’t even want to compare. This seems much more entanglable.
I need more demos, and someone like a Loopop who can dig deep on this, 'cuz this one can go deep and experimental.
I’ve seen their joystick synth around and think it’s equal parts cool and chaotic. Just looking at the placement of the jack inputs has me thinking this company embraces chaos like a cowboy embraces a horse.
Would really like to get my hands on the efx unit and have a wild ride with it.
This fx unit is the first thing from them I’ve actually been interested in. The other synths/“drummachines“ seem a bit too niche. Glad they exist though
stumbled on this yesterday on youtube. the entanglement space looks really cool. i wonder if they have documentation, seems like their stuff is all highly complex
this is seriously the coolest concept, coolest looking, and most exciting sounding synth i’ve ever seen. i understand why elektron synthesis is a little less complex because everything has to be realtime p-lockable and sequencable, but i really wish they’d start incorporating some modern things like complex spectral synthesis
i also think they could definitely take some cues from the torso s-4 but thats a different story
anyway, if this thing were about $2000 cheaper, i’d be all over it
same thought since years, love my elektron boxes but I really wish they would make a modern equivalent of say a monomachine, with tons of different freaky algorithms, additive synthesis, granular, physical modeling, spectral processing etc… but yyeah as you said, that probably adds way too much latency and sucks up cpu power and makes it not as performable, so I dont know if this will ever happen
Ended up with a ModelQ2 recorded a quick little mix of it and a very simple patch on the XY
Some really clever stuff found a way to patch up these really eerie vocal type patches… you can set up a few different voice modes… kinda treat it like a 4 monos or round robin poly or like this sort of stacking thing where the first voice always plays first but any other notes bring in the other voices. Obviously it does the whole crazy self trigger madness also.
I was curious of anyone who’s owned a Czochralski cells or 16 PSYCHE (I realize I’m writing to only a few of the people reading this at best):
How bad of an idea would it be to purchase one of these synths with no prior hands on modular experience? The 16P is particularly tempting, I really appreciate the structure with the six groupoids for the sort of “cellular” inter-modulation possibilities there. Obviously the central “patch bay” here is pretty chaotic (I’ve looked through the documentation a couple of times and that layout is not instantly intuitive…) and I’m well aware I’d be jumping into the middle of an ocean, so to speak. But being relatively lost and approaching in an exploratory way is exactly what appeals to me about it. I feel I would enjoy slowly learning and I wouldn’t be purchasing with the expectation of any specific results, more of a “conversation”. It’s the same way Ciat-Lonbarde stuff is appealing, although this is obviously pretty dense and has a different approach.
I’m not new to synthesis at all, but I’ve never done any modular patching. Guess I’m just looking for feedback about the experience. I’m about 50/50 on whether I take the plunge some time this year.
EDIT: I do have some interest in the Cz cells, but it is, at heart, drum and rhythm focused (although obviously not very constrained). The joysticks are very nice. The 16P seems more tonal and drone focused which is my primary draw to it.
I’d check on availability of 16 Psyche - I just sold one to someone in talks with Kirkis for other instruments. So either the price went up or there’s long lead times, as they’re hand built by him.
Sounds like you understand the challenge, the unique internal routing, UI with no labels, patch bay grouped together.
If you have $3k to burn and plenty of time I’d say go for it! Folks in the modular thread might be able to comment better on learning curve and if it’s a good place to start. I sold mine for funds and lack of time with an 18 month yr old + being on the job hunt.
