Some people mentioned that if it has a good sound & great workflow it will look good… but a lot of complaints about looks are the color, which has nothing to do with sound or workflow. A lot of people hate on the look of the Moog Grandmother due to the color, yet I bet it has a great workflow … & demos sound good to me.
Personally I would even have fun playing with this:
Might not have a good workflow or sound, but that’s the fun. To transform something ugly into something beautiful. To conquer challenges. To CREATE something. If the synth, drum machine or DAW does all the work what’s the point. I made some beautiful songs in a DAW with vst’s one time, but the vst’s already sounded beautiful & the sequencer put the hits where they’re supposed to be. So in the end I didn’t feel like I, ME, made a beautiful song… kind of going off topic here, but my point is, for example, I make a song, someone asks how I made it & I show them a kiddy toy, couple maracas & a sp404… to me that’s more impressive then making it with a pretty $2,000 synth that sounds beautiful from the start.
I’m not hating, just trying to provoke thought. I DO understand…I don’t think a lot of you are saying that looks are THE MOST important thing… I think a lot of you are saying that a well crafted piece of gear is beautiful because it’s well crafted. & yeah, if you have a nice studio with amazing gear, yet the keyboard I posted above was smack in the middle it would throw the whole look off.
I do have gear that I love the look of…… Ms-20 mini…… MPC 2500 blacked out…… Boss Me-50 guitar pedal…… I do like the looks of Op-1, but I realized when I show it off to people that don’t make music I feel weird about it, like I’m just showing them a toy……. If they only knew! But I just don’t think it’s important… I don’t think it matters.
& I’m surprised how many people think Aira’s are ugly. Just black boxes with a green stripe. Reminds me of a Kawasaki Ninja.