Again, it should be an OPTIONAL feature that can be turned on or off, which I said in the original post - “You save your track as a SOUND. Then, in the DT settings somewhere, you could set it so that if that specific sound is on the same track as previous patterns,”
Here’s how I envision it working (in my perfect implementation):
- You create a kick for your song and put it on track 1. You save it as a SOUND titled T1Kick.
- In the DT settings somewhere, you can have a few options:
- All T1Kick instances on any track in any pattern/bank will always be effected by changes in any other pattern/bank.
- Only T1Kick instances on T1 will be effected by changes in any pattern/bank.
- Same as the first 2, but per bank (for people that do 1 song per bank).
- Original mode - changes are only per pattern.
This would give insane amounts of flexibility for multiple different work flows.
It’s not a nightmare on the OT or A4 once you get used to it, so why would it be a nightmare here? Not everyone uses their devices the same way. Some of us, as has been discussed in the feature request thread, would find something of this nature to be insanely useful for the way in which they work. Some, such as yourself, would not. My idea allows for individual tracks to be linked throughout patterns or not, user’s choice.
Also, I have the OT, DN, and Rytm, and I’ve had the A4, Machinedrum, and Monomachine. None of my remaining Elektron boxes fit the particular role that the DT does in my setup. If they did, this wouldn’t have even been an issue for me.
Why is the idea of giving people more flexibility so opposed here?