Ableton Move [Archived]

Recently got a Dirtywave M8, and it will be really hard for Ableton Move to beat it.

3 Likes

I’m with most everyone else in hoping that it’s a killer groovebox, but I’m not completely convinced this sort of thing is in Ableton’s wheelhouse. Live, and DAWs generally, are about giving the user all the power and flexibility they’ll ever need. But the good grooveboxes have a focused set of features running on limited hardware, all of which is designed around a particular composition workflow. Elektron is at the top of this game imo, but I haven’t seen anything like this come out of Ableton, even with Push (not saying it’s impossible). Note is a nice tool, but truly just a sketch pad.

The thing with Push is that it’s pretty much a blank canvas, how I find it works best is to customise it into your own idea of a good groove box using that flexibility and then work within the limitations/constraints you’ve chosen for yourself (over and above the constraints and limitations that obviously follow from the Push hardware). But not everyone will be into this, where currently I’m going down a rabbit hole on how to implement MPC style event level mutes consolidated onto a single drum rack for an entire project, and I’m pretty close to a solution.

3 Likes

I think you’re underselling Note a bit here… It has 8 tracks, 8 clips per track, automation, plenty of usable presets, you can record your own samples etc…

It’s not a fully fledged portable hardware groovebox by any stretch but you definitely can use it to lay down complete song ideas and the ux is pretty great

4 Likes

You could be right, I’ve had pretty limited experience with it.

I really like my Push 2. But sound design on it is a pain, for me. I’d much rather just look at the instrument GUI on my monitor. I can see the layout, graphics, and controls all at once, and see what everything is doing at a glance.

I hope they don’t try and take sound design too deep on the Move. This is assuming it’s some kind of portable groove box, of course. I could imagine just having a few macros to control instruments. Some would probably be presets made by Ableton. Would be cool to make your own in Live too, save them as presets, and port them to the Move as desired.

In other words, I just hope they keep it a simple portable sketchpad. I would definitely buy that to use for sketching songs on the couch, while traveling, etc. Then expand on those sketches when back at my desk with Push 2 and computer.

2 Likes

Bruh they really keep it tight under a seal… kept googling… NOTHING!

Boy, this & other forums are going to melt down if it’s NOT a groovebox of some sort :frowning:

5 Likes

Hence, a good reason not to do a teaser campaign! Some disappointment is inevitable. We all build up our ideal device in our imaginations.

If they just drop it out of the blue, you either want it, or not. But hard to be disappointed or ā€œmadā€ at them.

1 Like

This (the ā€œcould it be a groovebox from Abletonā€ one) is quite an interesting discussion even if it isn’t one! Especially paired with the recent Ricky T comments about why owning hardware can be a benefit over software (tldr: limitations and speed.)

DAWs are unique in that you can of course do absolutey anything. In my case, my workflow did lead me to a kitchen sink approach ā€œjust becauseā€ at one point. It’s all good for learning but that taught me that there’s a reason folks talk about limitations. While technically you can create a groovebox in Live, it doesn’t look or behave like one so you react differently. On the flipside, Circuit Tracks has some extremem limitations, but many people love it. I imagine to Ricky’s point this is about having useful constraints on the process at the right time.

All hardware has decisions from the manufacturer baked in by default. In my mind, Note is the perfect example of a useful constraint. All you can do is load a subset of synths and samples from the Core Library. But probably the biggest aspect of it is there’s no setup or routing to do. That makes you make choices and keeps things moving. In that way Note feels like a Circuit Tracks app to me.

I can’t think of a DAW maker who has actively pulled away from the ā€œeverything is possibleā€ kitchen sink approach until Note. But it’s not completely unreasonable if you think about it. Tally up all the ā€œI wish there were a Circuit Proā€ comments with all the ā€œPush 3 ain’t worth it, get a used Push 2ā€ stuff, as well as the ongoing popularity of devices like the Digitakt and Polyend Tracker, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to explore that as a company looking to offer options for using their system.

Time will tell!

7 Likes

I’m with you on this, as much as it’s an excellent device for more hands-on control of my favourite DAW, the Push 2 still required trackpad and keyboard control of the session, particularly for manipulating warp markers which is a huge part of my workflow, as well as a huge part of what makes Live such a special DAW.

1 Like

Wow.

Still no leaks.

They’ve got a good handle on their supply chain and testers. :wink:

5 Likes

Was thinking the same which probably means odds are shortening on this being something naff and not new hardware!

1 Like

image

2 Likes

Or… they’re showing renders & selling the concept. Preorder NOW and get it in the summer 2025

Edit: although this would be dumb, and not wroth a teasing campaign.

Reason studios’ reason compact and figure on iOS are examples that predate note by a few years which fit your description of basic, to the point, write a cool idea quickly and easily made by a DAW. Reason compact projects load up in reason standalone so you can finish them off in the DAW. Too early? Too niche? :man_shrugging: Idk, I still love those apps.

2 Likes

Tbh, they haven’t teased shit. They just said ā€œWe have a new thing called Move and the reveal is October 8thā€

If anyone feels disappointed or let down next week it’s all on themselves. :rofl:

14 Likes

Stem Separation is a funny thing.

How does one license those separations if they release commercial music?

It’s still piracy or illegal use of commercial music if you release it commercially.

Plus it all sounds like low fi bit crushed garbage when the extraction is done.

I’m just not sold on it since it doesn’t sound good and doesn’t really help the artists whose music is being separated.

I dunno. I get it at the same time i don’t get it.

Don’t get me wrong, i use Samples like mad…but i purposely use royalty free and/or licensed sound sources so i don’t have to think about the legality of all it—and copyright strike violations on the Tubes and IG.

4 Likes

Whoever faked that trademark filing is watching this thread and absolutely cackling to themselves.

4 Likes

Devious. Haha.

1 Like