I saw something about this in the manual. If you try opening the project you get a message on the display saying that Move is four tracks maximum.
This is a very good review:
Looks like itā¦
I was curious about this too ā according to the manual, Move will only open the first four tracks of your Note set. Not the most intuitive limitation IMO but my Note sets rarely use more than four tracks anyways.
Edit: Section 4.3, ā Note that because Move is limited to four tracks, any Note Sets that contain more tracks will open only the first four tracks.ā
Can you create a template then do a save as?
Per drum pad I think he said !
no as per the sonic state video
not yet.
Iām quite curious about the speaker quality.
As far as being sequenced by an external sequencer goes, it canāt receive midi sync, only send it. And the manual says it can only be controlled by full speed or low speed midi compliant devices and not hi-speed so itās unclear if it will sync with something like Digitakt II which is hi speed USB 2.0
A āgrooveboxā that doesnāt receive clock is fucking wild lmao
from this review itās not that good
The built-in speaker is not great, but it works in a pinch ā if you need to test something quickly, for instance
You say āyetā, does that mean Ableton mentioned itās in the plans?
You can use Ableton link. 
Push also doesnāt fit my workflow because I donāt use the session view at all. Been using live for 20 years and have probably tried the session view less than 5 times and never actually finished any song started with session view.
I was initially hoping this would bring control to the rest of the program which is what is missing for me. Iām considering ssl or console 1 for a more hands on control that the push just wonāt deliver. I want a mixing workflow fully integrated with live where I wonāt need the mouse/keyboard/screen.
The move, as you suggest, and Iām hoping, sounds like it can cover a bit of that ground and that is what would make me consider getting it depending on how itās implemented. Does it follow selected tracks? Can it control any device within any track?
Iām probably trying to rationalise maybe getting it and imagining possible workflows with it
this isnāt true imho⦠look on the audiobus forum and search for circuit post by kobamoto rin⦠promises were made, tears were shed, and now itās time to Move
Itās a myth that there are no obligations after a product has been made, we are in the 21st century and manufacturers always talk about their intentions, plans, roadmaps, etc⦠in the sonic state video they talked about having an update roadmap⦠that is the norm, because it is also the norm now days that most products arenāt released ācompletedā they are usually released with at least loose ends that need to be tied up⦠in addition to all of that every company literally puts up a feature request section and ask the community for ideas for features they want implemented⦠feature request by consumers are not the enemy of anything imho for these reasons, they are to be expected and appreciated by developersā¦
It is exactly what I expected: a device thatās arbitrary limited to push (pun not intended) people to Ableton.
Good: some clever design decisions, it being the same code base as note was expected (and is a good call).
Meh: it stays close to abletons design language⦠But imho for a portable device rounded corners would have been chosen, screen is okay for what it does, but a slightly bigger screen with double the resolution to be able to have some more permanent informations on a glance would have been better.
Low: 4 channels, lack in generative sequencing, no audio lanes (ālimitationsā/āworkaroundā through the drum rackā¦)
They at least did hit a sub 500⬠point. But there is a bunch of competition, and at moments it reminds me of the op-1 in Ableton.
Connectivity: pretty bare bones. The moment you want to add more then 1 modern device, it gets hard. No analog Midi outs, only USb. 1 small line in. 1 line out (that oneās fine).
If I ever catch one in a sale or second hand for 2-30 sure. As it stands itās another box that only wants to let you start on the go and wants you to move (ā¦pun still not intended) to Ableton.
Before anybody comes with snark:
I donāt say itās a bad product.
For some it will be great.
But in a market where we have many options, and all of them are barely pushing forward, this it not a game changer, itās the same box in a different flavor to extract more value by upselling them ableton.
Itās the apple way, selling you the vision how great all works together, but try integrating an iPad with other devices that are not from apple.
Still no word of note for android.
This is not Ableton on the go.
This is not a dawles setup. This is āstart a typical grovebox loop on the couchā¦and move to the drawā.
If thatās what you want with better integration and less external hardware / a great Ableton controller: this is worth a look.
If you want a dawles device: this wonāt cut it any more then the rest.
how many Fx per track again, is it 2 or only 1?
and sorry for this one but does move have panning?
Thereās an Ableton showcase video of a lady recording a Kalimba and then playing back the sample polyphonically. I liked that. I thought from the other overview video this only had drum rack monophonic sample playback. Confused about how that all fits together.
only 4 tracks makes me sad, at least 4 audio and 4 midi tracks