Ableton Live 12

900 pages :astonished: it’s the War and Peace of manuals.

2 Likes

I used this meme/scene before but maybe it’s time again
.

10 Likes

i’ve been doing this for ages… jam (or record hardware into) in live… make arrangement… finalize 90% of edits etc… then export to Logic for mixing and that last 10%.

used to do the same thing w/audiomulch as well. export the stems to Logic for mixing… final edits…

i’ve used Logic since 2.4 or something so it’s pretty cozy and i like it for mixing. though it’s not perfect… it’s just what i know and am comfortable with. every now and then i make a whole track in logic though… and once in a while do the same in Live including mixing…

protools, logic, cubase, DP all have some deep tools for certain things and a different paradigm for mixing. they’re more classic console + tape machine type scenarios. though in recent years they’re throwing everything + the kitchen sink into them to make them more Ableton-like w/clips etc.

1 Like

For me the appeal of Cubase is how good it is for mixing, due to the mixer and Control Room, also the piano roll and MIDI editing is very good, the Project Logical Editor, and the chord track. Cubase really excels at being a comprehensive ā€œbread and butterā€ DAW, mainly for composition using a more linear workflow. There is the arranger track which you can use to create sections that you launch like clips, but it’s not the same thing at all like session view in Live.

All this talk about DAWs and their different strengths really highlights why I think it’s so important that the DAWproject file format becomes widely supported, as I also use multiple DAWs and would love to have a more convenient way to transfer my work back and forth between them.

5 Likes

Most of that are devices manuals. Some of them are pretty complex.

1 Like

Reason’s is ~1.6k pages, and it’s very good too!
Introduction | Reason Studios

1 Like

Funny. I use live to do the final touches the same way some of you use Cubase or Logic. Write in reason/hardware finish in Live.

That’s why you like session view so much! You use live as just a sketch pad. Insert the Gus Fring ā€œwe’re not the sameā€ meme here…

2 Likes

I think for most people this kind of workflow - write in one DAW, mix/master in another - is mostly about changing the ā€œsceneryā€ and environment, with enforces one to commit and also to see & think the track in a different light.

So frankly, no wonder any combination works :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Nobody?

Or any other suggestions on how to easily record automation of external hardware knob tweaks into the arrangement?

I sure can’t be the only one struggling with this, right?

1 Like

I don’t use external MIDI gear so can’t help, but I’m curious why do you care that the CCs are captured in track automation and NOT inside of the clip?

MIDI CC messages are part of the ā€œMIDI specā€ so their natural place is to be inside of the clip that contains the MIDI.

Sorry if it’s a silly question :slight_smile:

1 Like

How Ableton 12 perform on Macs with M1?

Using Bitwig for almost 10 years but would really like to get Ableton too because of M4L.

I’m using it on both an M1 Air 8GB and M1 Mini 16GB and haven’t noticed any performance issues.

1 Like

Well, if you automate a parameter of a software synth or fx, you do it in the automation lanes. It makes sense to me to be able to use hardware gear the same way.

It also gives a much better overview than hidden inside a clip.

It is also easier to see where in the global timeline you’re editing the automation.

However, I just found a max4live device ControlChange8.5 which might do the trick. Will try later.

2 Likes

Thank you for info. Might wait for black friday or xmas sale, hope it will be on discount.

If I bought one of the upcoming Mac minis with the m4 chip, is Ableton likely to run well on it straight off, or is there a wait while Ableton figure out compatibility? I’m unfamiliar with Apple.

it’ll run fine. software for apple silicon machines is the same regardless if it’s M1/2/3/4 etc… ableton has been compatible with apple silicon for a while now. the MacOS may be another issue though i think it’s fine based on everything i’ve read. it’s a new OS so all the software devs haven’t caught up w/it but most are fine even if their site says ā€œdon’t update to sequoia yetā€. so, don’t worry.

2 Likes

Live 12.1 does not work on my M2 Mac Mini.

ControlChange8.5 doesn’t work bidirectional either.

So far, CC Map8 works pretty much exactly how I’d like, but it doesn’t show its parameters to Push :frowning: even though the developer said it should (but its years ago, so that functionality might have been broken with updates…)

Yeah, for anyone new to Mac, the CPU is never a compatibility issue (with the exception of once-every-15-years transitions like what just happened with Intel to Apple Silicon… but that’s done now, so don’t worry) but the OS upgrades can be tricky with audio software.

Some years, the changes break things, and if you’re buying a new Mac right after the new OS came out, it might have some issues with your existing software out of the box. This year’s update, Sequoia, has been a pretty smooth transition, though, so as @ignatius says, don’t worry if vendors haven’t officially updated their compatibility statements.

That’s odd re: the Mac Mini M2. Live 12.1 works fine on the M2, and M3 macbooks in my household.

Could it be a storage or RAM issue?

1 Like