i still wonder if we had insisted on the first model if we would be as sharp in our opinions. because when we love we do not count time on a machine. But when something does not please us, we tend to sell and find an alternative solution, while insisting in general allows to have a more neutral opinion on a device at the END.
i agree there’s difference no doubt, Filter (in terms of frequency) and Overdrive… i do feel also Bass are more easy to achieve… But i’m in the middle of Sound Design with it especially in the Low End department. And if it’s a real pleasure, maybe i discover better the analog four than the first time i had… (simple personal reflection here)
What i do know is they both have they own character, i have the feeling FM doesn’t really react the same way on both machine, anyway it’s a good addition to alter timbre and get different sounds at the end.
But i’m coming to my point now, i know now i will process my A4 externally in 70% of the time (Effects, EQ, Compressor) and i haven’t that in mind when i buy the Analog Four mk1, i consider it like all the other box like a self contained chain in one box… But to my taste it’s not. Even the MK2 model… in my music genre, i need more possibilities in Distortion for the Timbre, a Drive who warmth the Damn Thing (at this point i do think the A4 + AH are perfect together)
But i need EQ, Compression, and Effects to cover my creation duties. Now things are more an evidence to me i can’t ask for that in one box… even if the Analog Four Effects are Fine…