Yeah the ‘pseudo lfo FM’ they introduced in the A4 update is pretty mild and tame by FM standards. Better than a kick in the nuts I guess.
Not a huge fan of the A4 filter either. Sounds like when it’s wide open it’s still slightly filtering and effecting the sound. A bypass option like the heat would be nice.
Everything about the A4 is just nice, but nothing exceptional imo.
The AR has a naturally bigger, rounder sound that I much prefer, and is best at weird and bizarre percussion imo, rather than trying to emulate standard drum tones.
The sample playback takes it to a whole different level as well obviously
I do hear you on the FM being tame. I had an Octave Cat which was just about the most fun I’ve ever had with FM. The FM on the A4 seems like it will sound good at some limited ranges as more of a way to modify the tone than something you’d actually want to manipulate in real time for effect like VCO on VCO fm.
Only one box? Has to be the RYTM.
Digitakt filled with Samples from Microtonic/PO32.
1 Like
If you are more into wanting a synth based groove-box, as opposed to drum based, don’t overlook the huge benefit of the A4’s mini keyboard.
IMHO the A4 has the best note input capability of any of the Elektron boxes.
I have both A4 and Ar (both mk2)
I bought mk1 versions about 5 years ago
they are a very good combination
AR: heavy beats, nice compressor… all the mono-synth possibilities are there so you can make pads, leads, etc.
But sound design on A4 is much better for me. better filters for that, better envelopes, nice arp, nice transpose, nice keyboard… Also the beats are very nice. Deep kick, sharp and clear hh and perc. but no compressor
also I like it to make a kick on all 4 voices, then record it to i.e. ableton, and use it in there… then make a next sound. a 4 voice kick is hard to compete for the Ar, imo
didn’t know rytm could do that. wonderful demo!
1 Like
There are a number of things the A4 can do that the RYTM cannot, and of course the opposite is also true. They are both good for very different things. But for me the biggest drawback of the RYTM, and the one thing I wish they both did the same, is the External Input.
On the A4 you have this awesome Stereo input with access to the Send FX bus and a sequencer track. On the RYTM it’s just an input with a bit of a compressor. I’ve never used it. It makes connecting other gear to the RYTM a much blander affair than connecting gear to the A4
2 Likes
Here is a video i posted about a year and half ago, using some premade loops.
1 Like
I think I’m just more excited about a deeper synth engine that could be worked into making full tracks with drums.
I know I mentioned the hiphop thing which would pretty much require sampling (at least for the sounds I’d be going for) but this is still far from the main kind of stuff I’d make. Most of what I make probably falls under video game soundtracky kind of stuff and the A4 just seems really awesome for this.
I still have and use ableton and could probably easily sync the A4 up via overbridge and use ableton for sampling. I realize this is not exactly single box standalone territory like I started with, but I do appreciate all of the ideas and advice thus far. I’m still deciding as I go along what I’d want this smaller setup to look like and do.
If I were to settle on non mk2, I’d prob have enough money left to add a digitakt for sampling instead and just run it through a voice of the A4 and use its filters for the bulk of the sound design.
Can anyone speak to how well they would actually sync together? I know they are both capable midi devices but what about as far as saving and loading certain patches/songs/sketches together smoothly?
Leaning towards A4 + Ableton still so I’m just thinking aloud on other possibilities.
Sync wise, there’s no issues. Good pairing.
In answer to the original question -
You can’t go wrong with either. If pushed to choose one over the over, it would be the a4 due to the depth of the thing. Not to say the AR isn’t deep.
The a4 can be anything you want-drum machine, Drone machine, modular interface, 4 x mono synths , analog poly, fx processor.
don’t expect to much rom overbridge
it is not a success (yet
i think a4 mk1 only have overbridge 1
it did work for me with the A4, but not that well
a4 mk2 will use overbridge 2
it will come out one day
if you really want overbridge and a4 (and you hsve the money or you are able to save some more)
go for a4 mk2
really enjoy your music
off topic: i like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHW1oY26kxQ
any tips for this kind of music?
Thanks bud, although you might have confused some random link I posted as something I made, heh. Unless your talking about the Grassy track I posted early on.
Here is another thing I made using nothing but the DSI Rev2 (including the drums again) https://soundcloud.com/pkmood/aitd Honestly tracks like this and Grassy were my favorite to make. Structure wise, these are pretty simple and I feel like the pattern chaining and scenes could be perfect for the way I like to build up random jams like these.
That and Grassy were just audio loops I recorded into Clip View from the Rev2 and slowly built up live while manipulating effects and recording the outcome. The fact that I’d be sequencing on the A4 instead of just playing static loops would allow me to make changes to the sounds themselves over time. I’m really excited about the possibilities and it feels like the way I’ve been making music w my Rev2 will be translate exponentially well over to the A4. I’ve never really gotten used to arranging things in the typical horizontal Daw style view.
Here’s a random single drum patch I made on my Rev2, sequenced by Ableton. https://clyp.it/xpzps55h I’m posting these examples mainly because I’m excited for the A4 and it seems to offer a lot of potential for the kind of stuff I’ve already been doing with the Rev2 and Ableton. I think me and the A4 might be a good fit. 
Regarding tips for lofi:
I had a digitakt for a little and it would be super good for lofi hophop kind of stuff. Although far from my specialty, I think the best thing for that style (in any device or daw) is keeping things un-quantized and loose. Sample some random jazzy stuff and apply some filtering so make it sound less full. Sort of like its coming from an old radio or something.
The biggest thing holding anyone back would be rhythmic chops. Practice getting a good flow going with some finger drumming and incorporate some sampling into the mix.
Though I’ve already committed to buying an A4mk2 from a friend, this thread is really making want a Rev2 
I love the Rev2 and I’m a huge fan of the modern prophet sound. People are annoyed with the filters sometimes but I like that chalky/brassy sound.
It gets plenty deep with modulations and assigning them is a breeze (much easier than A4 will be, I know it.) You can quickly attach like 8 different things to the mod wheel for some really cool performance effects/drones. 4 LFOS that you can map to eachother and create some truly generative stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osk-73W-ueI - I always link this to show the modulation capabilities.
This other video by the same guy has got to be my single favorite example showing the modern prophet tone. People hate because its not a P6 or P5. I say that’s a great thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbWrEL07vUI
Its sequencer is a bit meh though. The Rev2 was my first synth and I dove into it head first. It works great as part of a larger setup and I really love its general sound and capabilities for sound design.
In a perfect world I wouldn’t have to sell it but I’m focusing on different things in my life and need to cram the entirety my music fun into a single unit and the A4’s size and feature set better suite that for now.
Oh, and I don’t know if I mentioned it already (I posted it in sales) but I would trade my Rev2 outright for an A4mkii. Comes with gigbag, fancy knobs and some other cool extras you can see here. WTT My DSI Rev2 for an Analog Four MK2
2 Likes