Drum programming/ Jungle/ Aphex Twin

Have to come back to this old thread.
Many of his tracks still sound so fantastic in slowed down versions and while listening to these Iā€™m blown away more then ever by this crazy detailed drum programming and arrangement.
When slowed down itā€™s easier to follow and to grasp how much things are going on there. And what a great organic groove these beats have slowed down.
Programing, mixing and arrangement pure genius.





13 Likes

Can you do it 150% faster now ?

Hard to listen Aphex at 75%ā€¦

1 Like

I donā€™t know if youā€™ve heard this version of the album- but it feels almost like an entirely different record

3 Likes

Yes it does. I might even prefer it. Iā€™m not the biggest fan of RDJ album. Itā€™s quite cheasy at timesā€¦ some great tracks, but around that period come to daddy ep and especially druqks are my favourites.
But yeah, crazy how the tempo change results in a completely different listening experience.
The detail is just so stunning

2 Likes

Can this type of glitched drumming be done on a Digitakt???

Seems hard without the sample slicingā€¦

Chopping an Amen or any drum break in the Digitakt itself is a complete nightmare. (and No i donā€™t have a DAW that I could do it in! Lols Daw-less!)

2 Likes

DT can go in this direction, but slicing and timestretching are two things that are really missing for these purposes.
Octatrack is suited much better. But to get this level of detail, you have to be very talented I guess :slight_smile:

I really like this tutorial for the DT to get some basic ideas:

1 Like

Thems fightin words :slight_smile:

Out of curiosity which parts? Fingerbib never ceases to blow my mind and Iā€™ve heard it a thousand times.

3 Likes

The lead synths in 4 (which is a great track though) and in Fingerbib. Goon Gumpas. Parts in Girl boy song.
I donā€™t know, I donā€™t love the sound aesthetics of the sample based stuff too much, like the string parts for example.
I used to, but now I prefer his synth heavier stuff. My favourites on this are Cornish acid and Peek 824545201. They have the vibes of the Come to daddy EP, which I love.
I also prefer the To Cure A Weakling Child Version on the Come to daddy EP.

1 Like

:rofl: One of my favorite aspects of the album. For his ā€œPopā€ album, a master melodist and prankster approaches the stuffy arena of Classical music by irreverently creating Baroque pop from samples of a single string instrument. Magnificence juxtaposed with expertly arranged Jungle and your have yourself some insane genius.

Also amazing. Whole thing is amazing.

I am hesitant to admit that as the proper ā€œfollow-upā€ to RDJ, I was hurt way back when, and didnā€™t pay it the attention it deserved and have not since gone back to it. I am ashamed even writing this and promise to make amends soon.

Iā€™m convinced he used a tracker for RDJ album; either way, he definitely used one for drukqs. 90s trackers donā€™t have slicing and timestretching! Everything was manual in those days, and is definitely possible to make with the digitaktā€¦ youā€™d just use up a lot of patterns :smiley:

2 Likes

Yes he used this pp tracker for the breakbeat tracks on druqks

Iā€™m sure he used a tracker for everything from Hangable Auto bulb to Druqks.

Didnā€™t know that, never used a tracker. But in my blind fanboyism I sometimes try to convince myself I have to learn renoise.
On this website he commented that PP was his favourite tracker, but he still often uses Renoise.
Some people say the Octatrack is a bit like a hardware tracker.

Renoise is great! Iā€™ve been using trackers for over 20 years and have settled with Renoise as my favourite tracker. Itā€™s really next level in terms of it extending the tracker philosophy into something modern. It does have slicing, but timestretching is still a manual thing (actually not that hard to do manually).

2 Likes

I watched some tutorials and Iā€™m curious to learn whatā€™s the great thing about that tracker interface compared to linear DAWs.
I read people saying it can be a really fast workflow.
For someone unfamiliar with this interface, it looks crazy complicated and unintuitive :slight_smile:
But Iā€™m sure it has its advantages

2 Likes

Iā€™ve almost bought Renoise multiple times- I really canā€™t fathom how you can make crazy breakbeat with a trackerā€¦

Perhaps it would be beneficial to try it out with Sunvox?

Damn I want learn too much :smiley:
Ok with what should I go first? Renoise or Max Msp? :loopy:
Or really learning the Octatrack after 3,5 years of owning :wink:

2 Likes

aphex himself produced stuff at that tempo then sped it up, that was standard practice for all the break core guys

Renoise would be for composition and Max/MSP is about instrument creation.

I reckon Renoise would be a quicker thing to learn and figure out if itā€™s right for you.

Max/MSP is pretty endless from what little Iā€™ve poked around in it. I need to get back to trying to learn it at some point.

would make sense. You would go crazy hearing it all the time at that speed while writing it :slight_smile:

1 Like

Max is also amazing for sequencing.
I spent quite a lot of time trying to get into it, but itā€™s really hard in the beginning.
Started it several times, always gave up. Last time I quit cause I found out about Numerology for sequencing, but thatā€™s pretty crazy in itā€™s own right.

What? Like building a sequencer in Max? Or are you actually patching up sequences?

This sounds bizarre!