Apologize if there are similar threads out there already, I did some basic searching but didn’t find anything that seemed to already cover this ground, and wanted to get the communities take on this. I haven’t been on Elektronauts for long but it’s an awesome place and I’d really like to hear peoples thoughts.
I’ll start:
For me it feels like there is a massive gap between my taste and my ability. I inevitably compare my musical output to the artists I admire and find it deficient. I try and turn this into something useful though and try to “copy” songs I like. In doing so I usually get inspired by something and end up completely diverging from what I was originally trying to do which was the entire point of the exercise.
I’m also pretty lazy. My setup is all hardware and so music making always feels very tied to the moment. This can be a good and a bad thing, but I’ve found it does seem to make it unlikely that I will return to ideas after exploring them. If I setup a new project and spend an hour or two jamming, it’ll either end up as a song on an album or I’ll never touch it again. I’ve been actively trying to combat this recently and forcing myself to work on a project for more than 1 session, with various levels of success. Typically in the past I take the advantages of the ephemeral nature of all hardware setups and then “brute force” it. Just make essentially 40 tracks or so and pick the best 8 or something. This is very time consuming though and I think (for me) has a lower quality output overall.
I’ve released 4 bodies of work (2 albums, 2 EPs, of questionable quality) during quarantine this year and am working on something new now that I feel like is some of the best music I’ve ever made (for me at least). I think the amount of time I’ve been putting in and (counter intuitively) being less critical overall of my output has lead to some stuff I’ve been really happy with.
This post is already pretty long and rambling already so I’ll leave it there; interested to see what you guys think.