What is Techno?

Techno. The word evokes responses as varied as there are metaphors for sound.

For some it’s mind numbing assault of sounds, colours and movement, inextricable from sound systems clubs and warehouses.

For others, techno is more personal, a soothing tonic of strings and rhythms and a way to articulate the feelings and axieties of a rapidly changing world.

Contrary to its name, techno is not a formula - it’s not about buying keyboard y and drum machine zand then charting your success.

Techno is a feeling, a mindset for interpreting the progressof technology and its effect on the human psyche.

Postmodern soul music at the very last.

Techno is where electronic music got funky, got transcendental - and got busy - and techno happened in Detroit first.

Now it’s world wide like Skynet.

(*Quoted from rom Dan Sickos “Techno Rebels”)
(**altered by Hooked, a pagan from the www.)

9 Likes

Techno was the sound of the future.

13 Likes

Early Drexciya.

7 Likes

I like Mylar Melodies’ definition: techno is the mechanical repetition of a mistake until it sounds good. At least, that’s what I’m trying to do when I make electronic music…

2 Likes

Feeling of coming together and dancing until morning and forgetting everything else, the basement of Tresor in the 90s, sunrise after a forest rave, hypnotic tribal rhytm and drum machines, ever evolving frontier of sounds you haven’t heard before

2 Likes

I would always refer to what Techno originally was and still is for me:

2 Likes

Techno is Juan Atkins, Juan Atkins is Techno.

9 Likes

I was a regular at chris liebings shows in the 90ties, he brought us the so called schranz sub genere. He started with extra percussions via drum machines, while he got older his sets got more tame though, i still listen to his sets now and then, because he can tell a story with his tracks.

For me techno is a form of liberation of the self, you make silly movements, and enjoy a group of strangers. I had a lot of fun dancing.

7 Likes

This description feels closest to me.

I suppose what techno is to you depends on where and when you grew up. As a kid in Jersey in the 80s and 90s, house & eurodance music was all around me, but most people I knew at the time called it “techno.” Only the real heads called it “house.”

To us, “techno” was less a genre than a style or sonic vocabulary. Someone might say “I love the end of Hyberbalad where Bjork goes full techno,” meaning “the part where the kick comes in and it’s pulsing 4-on-the-floor” or more simply “the part that makes you shake your butt.” Or you could say “this new NIN remix is way too techno.”

Meanwhile, to anyone older than about 40, “techno” seemed to be a broad term that meant any electronic dance music that wasn’t new wave or synthpop.

I really don’t know what the term refers to in 2023.

2 Likes

Your mom is techno

3 Likes

A trig on every step.

Techno is a hypnotizing form of House, usually faster than 130 bpm.

Thechno ? The oldest primate music, the first in primate history that makes lot of individualities been one at the same rythm.

Advise the alien to watch this:

5 Likes

From the hedonistic shit shows like tomorrow land and love parade to more artistic introspective stuff like aphex twin or rival consoles. I don‘t think you could describe that so easy.
Björk is right.

https://youtube.com/shorts/AadYGb5etSs?si=-chXb-gn-gmdzBMA

But I think a lot of people don‘t put it there. But it can be there and then its special.

3 Likes

You’re giving hedonism a bad name.

1 Like

It goes boom tish boom tish boom tish boom tish and couples nicely with various narcotics

1 Like

And the only thing Bjork had in common with techno was Mark Bell (RIP)

2 Likes

Björk is not Techno right, but she also worked with Arca. She has many connections into electronics not just bell.
Hedonistic four to the flour is not something I would explain to an alien if I had the chance. Wasted opportunity.

1 Like

“Fuck all that fluffy IDM crazy shit, this is the real factor how this shit started.” Eddie Fowlkes (in doc. posted above).

I’m pretty sure Mr. Fowlkes would agree that that Bjork doesn’t belong in an explanation of “what is techno”