Article from Attack Magazine.
Just read that one before checking the forums, nice read for us hardware addicts
Also just read this earlier. Good article. Live hardware improv is where itâs at. Iâve played numerous instruments in numerous styles of bands. With current technology, and our magical elektron machines, live hardware has never been more enjoyable to improvise with.
Rarely have I enjoyed performing live more, than I do with my current setup / project.
Good read, thanks. Lots of good artists commenting, but first time I hear of Disco Nihilist, and I like how he ends the article:
âright now itâs cool to be raw and hardware and have a table full of boxes and people think thatâs more authentically live. To me itâs more about what youâre saying. I would rather see something interesting in Ableton than another boring and mediocre version of Larry Heard with a 707 on stage.â
Always nice and fresh to end an article like this with a counterpoint!
Agreed, not only did that last quote hit me, but this did as wellâŚ
"Itâs not about making a point; we just want to enjoy our profession. Noodling over some playback or muting stuff on the desk was just boring and I just didnât see the point of it.â
Thatâs exactly how I feelâŚI just love the immediacy and kinesthetic nature of hardware. Itâs more enjoyable for me and realtime therapyâŚwhereas, working on a computer I get muddled and sidetracked by the sheer amount of options/possibilities.
Though, when youâre performing you want it to be interesting/different.
Iâve played a handful of shows using a monome. While it gave me a sense of improvisation, I always felt a bit sonically limited.
Nice article, thanks for sharing it =)
thanks for this article and make me discover attack! seem a good read⌠anothers site to make me discover to read??? thanks!!
But arent controller like Push or Maschine finally breaking the border?
I thought they use to call this Live PA⌠Good article finally some recognitionâŚ
Nice one!
Thanks =)
I read this the other day. Nice read.
But I gotta say, there arenât many people Iâd ever want to see whip up a live set in front of a crowd. Really the only one Iâd have faith in is our local hero mr Paul Birken.
As for myself, Iâm way too neurotic about my music to do that. I need to set everything how I want it, even if I have lots of room to go from there.
The Analog Four has some great features that encourage letting things get way out there (like reload kit/pattern) and not worrying about screwing it up too much. Hope to see more stuff like this in the future.
This is what live is:
Live rig has been updated to include the A4 and OT (both not pictured here).
A4 is an amazing box to use live - that performance mode is sweet as.
No computers, no worries!
Love from handmadeacid.com
iâd have faith in this guy to pull it off tooâŚsteevio, the live modular improv wizard .
What Unicorn 303 said +1 - My ever changing rig is to the rightâŚ
Best Regards
BM1600
I would rather see something interesting in Ableton than another boring and mediocre version of Larry Heard with a 707 on stage.â
I get his point but I do think that these discussions often are out of focus in a way.
I for one listen to music, I dont see music.
If it sounds good I couldnt care less if its made on a computer, hardware or an ukelele.
If it sounds good it is good.
I often wish concerts/sets were played in total darkness. All this âneedâ for visuals, be it a show, video or an artist jumping around,most of the time it only gets in the way of the music. Dont know were this visual need comes from?
So I just close my eyes and listens.
To be honest, that comment coming from Disco Nihilist is a bit of a cheek. The majority of his releases sound like throwback house/techno, something like a âmediocreâ version of Larry Heard or Armando Gallop, He even did a track called âGallopâ. Plus heâs also âfamedâ for his disco editsâŚwhich arenât exactly a forward thinking idea either. So for him to say something like that is just hypocritical.
Personally I like those tracks that heâs made, and I donât want to come across as hating or trolling, quite the opposite. I enjoy his stuff.
While I also agree with the sentiment of his comment, I just think why donât you set the example then!
I see where you are coming from but a the same time do you make music on a computer?
The problem with being DJs/Producers/Musicians is that the most hardcore guys spend more time listening for:
(1) what equipment the artist might be using.
(2) what recording/mixing/mastering/fx/techniques theyâre using
(3) mistakes (Tempo/Key)
(4) who the influences of the artist are and to what degree they are imitating
âŚand less time actually letting the music wash over them and feeling what the artist is projecting. Personally, I spend WAY too much time thinking about #4, to the point that I am hardly even paying attention to the music.
A song could be mostly derivative, a DJ set could be full of mistakes, a producer could be using a preset on a synth, but the overall finished product could have a certain feel to it that makes it special.
Which is why I think artists are the absolute worst critics especially when theyâre criticizing music in a similar genre to their own.
[quote="âcosmosuaveâ"]
I see where you are coming from but a the same time do you make music on a computer?[/quote]
yes and then I mostly use Ableton Live & Rektor. But I prefer OT and MD when making music myself. No ukeleleâŚyet.
In reference to Ryan ⌠I agree with everything you are saying and that is one pitfall of being a producer as I find I am always analyzing the music instead of just being a listener and enjoying the musicâŚ