Intrigued I did my own examination to rule out stuff, clear kit/pattern etc etc
Simple repeating constant pitch notes, tuned lowish to present the most obvious difference between the two devices (bi-wired by midi so changes on one are reflected in the other)
Itās clear from the get go that for certain synth settings there is a remarkable difference between Mk1 and Mk2 - itās fair to say Mk1 seems more āconsistentā , but itās not so straightforward to leave it at that
I wouldnāt say the Mk2 is less consistent, but its behaviour at catering for the successive notes is clearly different (so will be pattern and settings sensitive)
Here are some screen grabs, the first two are from the same recording, just rendered differently, the third is what happens if you add a bit of noise or a transient to the same pattern - they both behave the same
When thereās no transient or noise, they seem to stack/build differently when they are run into one another in the first example with the absence of transient/noise - highlighted on the fourth screen grab (same image as image 1 but notated) - a very very different vibe is heard !! Just look at the trajectory of those rough red lines scribbled on !
I now wonder if thereās an element of there being subtle differences that can be tuned out to give comparable response or whether there are differences under the hood that have been undisclosed
In my experience thereās a lot more low rumbling on Mk2 whereas Mk1 is generally tighter
They appear to be (in some cases) quite different (which doesnāt really bother me tbh) but itās good to know or to examine further
PS - there are two rim clicks on my Mk2 recordings to distinguish them whilst I cut/pasted these up in an editor - it was a looping 10 step pattern (pattern below) and the audio was cut from the middle of its longer looped recording (not from the start) so itās in a steady state so to speak - tuning in the -20 > -30ish range iirc
every figure : Mk1 on top, same pattern and settings so itās a direct comparison
This has echoes of the A4 bass drum patch (built on a resonant filter) it has to build up steam to get the filter pinging - I wonder if the introduction of a transient/noise to the synth settings is the key to consistency (as per 3rd figure)
But I can agree that thereās a clear difference when the parameters are mapped 1:1 between Mk1 and Mk2
I would also love to know if there are indeed tiny differences to the circuits