I’ve been thinking about this a bit because sometimes I have to mull over things for a while.

What do you think about this having some correlation to the honeymoon effect where you’re in a state of bliss with music, but at some point the honeymoon is over. So literally your brain produces dopamine because it’s pleasurable to create music but the more you get used to it, the more immune you become until you stop associating the feeling with feeling good, then you start to look towards what is causing you to feel less than what you did before?

Perhaps to not reach a point of having exhausted one’s “bliss” towards pure creativity is an indication of mental illness instead of wellness, or an extreme state of zen is required to continue feeling blissful about it - or perhaps there must be something that constantly ups the ante, such as forward momentum that produces a measurable result as a supplement to the brain pleasure center’s dwindling output. Maybe a combination of risk taking and a risk taker personality.

I feel like there might be some link here, because if you look at people who are the best in their jobs, some of them really genuinely hate the work they do and they are not invested in it as a matter of pride or enjoyment, but their lack of pleasure allows them to be consistent because they are not doing it for any reward other than the expectation that it is work…

Maybe I’m thinking too far into this but I feel there has to be something more to the equation than simply “more tools equals less repair”, as humans we’re unfortunately not so simple as that.

I think it’s true that if I had more tools when I was at my most creative point, I would have been even more creative than I was at that time. I can’t see it any other way, and I have less tools now than I did then but I distinctly struggle more, in fact I’m less confident of what I make now than I ever was at my apex.

2 Likes