People like comparisons, finding similarity and difference. When they announce the Proton Behringer amusingly said they cloned themselves
– meaning the Neutron.
You can read detail on the Proton in my unplugged thread. ( When appropriate does that thread get revived ? I wanted to post this there. ) From that you can see the similarities and differences.
Neutron vs Proton:
Features |
Neutron |
Proton |
Oscillators |
2 with 5 wave-forms |
2 with 5 wave-forms |
Paraphonic and Sync Mode |
yes |
yes |
Sub-Oscillators |
0 |
2 |
Multi-Mode filters |
1 |
2 (series or parallel) |
ASR envelopes |
0 |
2 with looping, reverse, inverse, bounce options |
ADSR envelopes |
2 |
2 |
LFOs |
1 with 5 waveforms |
2 with 5 waveforms |
Wave folder |
no |
yes |
Analog BBD Delay |
yes |
no |
Sample & Hold |
yes |
no |
Overdrive |
yes |
no |
Noise Generator |
yes |
yes |
Patch bay points |
56 |
64 |
Knobs and direct controls |
43 |
68 |
Quarks |
1 up, 2 down |
2 up, 1 down |
What also has been said is that the Proton is like a more West coast Neutron. They are using Cool Audio parts inside, so this does bring a sound.
It seems you can find influences, as you can with most other synths from most other companies. So in that way then these are like all those synths too.
[ Reference ]
ADDED : Quarks