Elektron has my full trust. But i‘m one of the people who don’t really into OB. My cheap Roland MX-1 can stream all channels simultaneously into my DAW, one track per channel. At the same time he can transfer Audio to the mixer. A midi channel for every single piece of my electric friends(yes Gary, they are all electric), can send midi CCs for automations, pattern changes. I can create my midi-templates for the gear I use and map the settings to a MPK 249 or every other controller, save it as preset.
Maybe I don’t get overbridge. Of course creating sounds with the editors like on the A4 mk1 is a great thing, but the streaming thing can be done. I know you can’t stream every single channel because of the lack of physical outs. It wouldn’t cost much more if they made the DT/AH/DN a little bit bigger. (I hope i won’t get killed for saying that ) The cost for the outputs isn’t the problem.
Only thing i know is that a company needs money, therefore new products must be released. Then there are investors and other reasons why and when something new needs to be released.
Did they focus on the MK2 series and the Digiton, knowingly that there are still bugs on the the DT and not overbridge for everyone? Yes, pretty sure IMO. Did they do it to fuck customers, no. Did they know how much code the have to write for Overbridge, no. Programming is something extremely complex, especially if you have to do with assembler language for the specific components. Software that runs without bugs on different operating Systems is a thing of the past and even there where bugs. But with increasing complexity of code, the error rate rises exponentially.
Think of the people 30 years ago, they would have killed someone to get some of the gear we have now and just wait a few months until it gets released. But even the i expect bug at the beginning and especially at the end, when we all reached windows 14, new transfer standards, or the AI apocalypse peaking in singularity!