Some questions for OT owners

modulatia · 2015-05-30T09:29:28.000Z

In my experience, the OT is almost ideal for creating glitchy stuff. I often start with a relatively tame loop and create 3 or more glitchy versions of it by mangling the sound and resampling it.

More generally, I find the process of creating music flows better with the OT compared to a DAW (I mainly used Reason). It’s just more immediate, and the scenes are very useful. There are some limitations but I am fine with them considering what I have gained.

There’s no guarantee that your experience will be like mine though.

Rabbitfrog · 2015-05-30T16:12:07.000Z

Attach a rubber band to a nail, spread it with you fingers to form a triangle - you can pluck it with your other hand’s finger and create acid basslines. And if you alter the tension at the same time you can make those basslines wobble.
See this is my thoughts, this is how I think when it comes to making music, I am not bound by technique, only the result and process matters.

If you have specific styles in mind and you want to make your tracks sound exactly like those tracks, then get the same gear. Otherwise you might be disappointed and frustrated.

I like my gear, so I have to live with the fact that what comes out might not sound exactly like the stuff I like but to me it doesn’t matter but I enjoy working on my gear and I trade enjoyment for mainstream sound.

You seem to be set on very specific goals, so contact those artists and ask them politely what gear they use. If you can’t afford it then stick with software emulation. Money is hard to come by and the world economies are far from stable, play it safe.

smilinggoat · 2015-05-30T16:47:31.000Z

I find the process incredibly dull, and uninspiring. So I’m wondering if you guys think that I can create the music I set out to make with an Octatrack. I am fine with sending audio into Ableton to mix it better, master, and fix it up. However, I am looking to purchase the OT to become my rock and foundation.

Quite frankly, I doubt the Octatrack is going to help you. If anything, you’re going to be just as uninspired and now also frustrated on top. No machine is going to give you a magical way to make music more interesting. It all comes from your dedication to the craft.

The OT is a very specific tool. Sure it can do many things, but it does them in a particular way. It’s not going to help you make any particular kind of music.

By all means, getting out of the box can help spice things up. But it’s not going to be a magic transformation.

OHEXOH · 2015-05-31T01:57:03.000Z

The Octa is a flexible beast so yes, you should be able to create something along the lines of what you want. But it is also it’s own beast and bound by it’s own limits, whereas something like Ableton is almost limitless.

I find making music with the OT a lot more fun and full of happy accidents. Tame those accidents and you have your own thing going on.

I have used Ableton a lot and for me the hardest part about using external machines like the OT is the bigger picture of song structure and breaking out from the loop mentality. It’s also very slow going when compared with Ableton in this respect.

A combo of the two could work but the lack of outs makes individual channel recording of a performance difficult.

Not sure where I’m going with my musings Personally I love the OT. At first it was intimidating and full of quirks. But as others have said, it’s an instrument and once you learn how to play it, then a new world opens up. Sampling becomes an expressive, creative art form.

Good luck.

xidnpnlss · 2016-04-12T13:00:31.000Z

I’m bumping this thread back to life because the OPs list of artists is basically identical to artists I’d like to rip off emulate. I hate.hate.hate working on the computer for inspiration (arranging/mixing is inevitable) so am thinking about an OT. So, OP, did you get an OT and how did you get on with it?

anyone want to chime in with their thoughts on the matter, particularly when it comes to a.) getting outside 64 step/4 bar loops and/or b.) sound quality (I’ve read some people on Muff Wiggler criticizing the Octatrackiness of the sound).

Thanks in advance.

EDIT: I perused the manual a bit more. Saw the track length settings. Much deeper than my AR. Nice.

PeterHanes · 2016-04-12T15:18:48.000Z

""xidnpnlss"":

…

anyone want to chime in with their thoughts on the matter, particularly when it comes to a.) getting outside 64 step/4 bar loops

…

EDIT: I perused the manual a bit more. Saw the track length settings. Much deeper than my AR. Nice.

The ability to use not only track length settings, but also tempo multipliers, one-shot trigs, and the malleability of sampling compared with synthesis, means that the OT is the Elektron instrument that is the most likely to get you out of repetitive 4/4 loops.

""xidnpnlss"":

…

b.) sound quality (I’ve read some people on Muff Wiggler criticizing the Octatrackiness of the sound).

…

I know that some people are very particular about quality of convertors and colourization of sampled sound, but unless you have both super-golden ears and a precisely-controlled acoustic environment then the OT’s hardware shouldn’t inhibit you from being creative. Think of the many OT users who don’t need to post their critiques on muffwiggler.

Tarekith · 2016-04-12T15:33:28.000Z

I’ve been a professional mastering engineer for 15 years now, I think the OT sounds great. All gear has a “sound”, but the OT is pretty damn transparent for what it can do IMO.

invisible_acropolis · 2016-04-12T15:40:56.000Z

id disagree that the OT doesnt excel at a specific genre - in my experience it definitely excels at creating the sort of 90s trip hop and downtempo stuff that features lots of cutup samples and juggling the bits and pieces of them (slices). the OT can destroy that genre, just crank it out all day long, and it sounds great doing it

its also pretty good for making any kind of electronic dance music - it has specific advantages for that, mostly for performance tho

basically, any loop-based music is a good fit for what OT can do

but it wont excel at classical compositions or anything with tons of tracks, also the whole mentality is just different - for example if i am sitting down to do some kind of soundtrack or long form linear song - i definitely go to the DAW because its just the easiest and most robust way to do that work in the quickest and most efficient way

yeh, its not as fun as just jamming on the elektron boxes - however that can also go sour if you get too caught up in polishing the loops over and over instead of moving on with the whole piece, as its very easy to get distracted by tweaking on hardware

xidnpnlss · 2016-04-13T00:58:01.000Z

""PeterHanes"":

Think of the many OT users who don’t need to post their critiques on muffwiggler.

Granted, their conclusuon later was that it had more to do with FX sounding similar. But yeah, you’re right.
@Tarekith good to know your opinion. Thanks.
Yeah I’ll keep digging through the manuals and videos. Thanks.

Regis · 2016-04-13T03:38:58.000Z

The styles I enjoy producing in:

Ambient/Drone (Tim Hecker and Oneohtrix Point Never):

I have similar aspirations, and would say that the OT is a great choice if you want to do this dawless and be confronted with hard times bu many happy accidents.

I believe Oneohtix used an OT live for a while although I know he did not compose with it. His main tools were a Roland SP sampler, a Juno and and an M1.

For those Oneohtix quirky rompler sounds you could get your hands on a old JV-1010 or similar synth for a few $.
Bought a beloved JV-880 after discovering R PLus 7 love the choir sounds.

Some pointers on the OT
-Yes you will probably get stuck working more in loops and its a tough pattern to break out of. Still is fun and inspiring.

-Some things are hard to program and way easier in a DAW such as long fade ins and long fade outs, so your gonna have to do some live tweaking even if you are working in song mode.

-I have come to the conclusion that the on board reverb and modulation effects are not up to par with what you would hear on these types of albums. They are useful and all, they just not creating that kind of stereo imagery to my liking. Might be worth looking into some good stereo pedals. (TC, eventide, Strymon) I have a TC hall of fame, sounds huge for the price.

edison · 2016-04-13T04:50:00.000Z

the real trick is not to hate the computer but use it as a weapon. the octatrack is insanely deep, but it’s only as strong as the source material. ive had bad luck with composing strictly with the OT. ableton is SO GOOD at composing and mixing. plugins are dope. so just get a start in ableton and then dump files to the OT, so powerful.

Tarekith · 2016-04-13T05:38:09.000Z

""edison"":

the real trick is not to hate the computer but use it as a weapon. the octatrack is insanely deep, but it’s only as strong as the source material. ive had bad luck with composing strictly with the OT. ableton is SO GOOD at composing and mixing. plugins are dope. so just get a start in ableton and then dump files to the OT, so powerful.

Agreed, pretty much everything I use in the OT goes through Ableton first. It’s just such a quick and easy way to prep anything “loopy” that you might want to further mangle in the OT.

CallOffTheVote · 2016-04-13T06:49:12.000Z

If someone is happy with general ableton workflow and results but just wants more hands-on/human interaction then just grab Push2 maybe? I don’t have one yet but seems the obvious first thing to try. Octa is amazing and I’d never sell but it’s a lot more stressful than Ableton if you want to make complete tracks inside it. Doable but you’ll feel the limitations. Rewards you in other, mostly unforseen, ways tho.

faktoid · 2016-04-13T07:25:50.000Z

I used ableton and push (1) and turned away from it.
Too much computer and mouse and shuffling around watching tutorial videos and trying to get my ideas done.
The moment I got back to hardware and the limitations of hardware I git more focused.
I use all kind of sources for sounds, my ipad, the microgranny, freesound.org, selfmade drumloops and the moment they are in the OT they become different.

There might be a symbiosis between ableton and the OT. That might depend if you want to get things done like all the others or if you want to find your own way of handling sound.

For me the OT is a great way to pick up sound and make it different. I habe it since last september and still discover new possibilities.

Concerning Ambient and Soundscapes it is a valuable part and my center piece to create music.

regards

F.

CallOffTheVote · 2016-04-13T10:50:28.000Z

""faktoid"":

I used ableton and push (1) and turned away from it.
Too much computer and mouse and shuffling around watching tutorial videos and trying to get my ideas done.
The moment I got back to hardware and the limitations of hardware I git more focused.
I use all kind of sources for sounds, my ipad, the microgranny, freesound.org, selfmade drumloops and the moment they are in the OT they become different.

There might be a symbiosis between ableton and the OT. That might depend if you want to get things done like all the others or if you want to find your own way of handling sound.

For me the OT is a great way to pick up sound and make it different. I habe it since last september and still discover new possibilities.

Concerning Ambient and Soundscapes it is a valuable part and my center piece to create music.

regards

All valid. But I’d say OT is gonna take most new users a couple of days of tutorial vids etc before they can do the deep stuff too. And I think the ‘focus’ that comes from non DAW stuff is mostly psychological. If you limit an ableton session to 8 tracks. 1 of every effect (your favourite reverb, delay etc), one synth (or same external setup you’d use with OT, and begin to use automation and resampling/bouncing like you’re forced to on OT etc it would probably be a different story. Not to mention that your experience with push 1 would prob be pretty different with push 2. It looks way better for sampling/chopping etc. Admittedly I prefer using OT than ableton, just way more spontaneous (maybe push changes this?) and scenes and p-locks always lead to the unexpected, but it’s much more taxing to do bread and butter stuff when structuring etc. I think overall the 2 different approaches prob balance out for pros and cons. Curious to see if I still gravitate toward my OT after I have push 2.

Huno · 2016-04-14T21:27:59.000Z

At first I thought you where Oneothrix Pointnever and I was like …mmmmm
eccojamms, hey?

Well, yes you can. you can make polyrythms, you have a filter that reacts to an envelope, you have a good delay and reverb, automation, you can sample sample and resample in realtime, you can timestretch in realtime or pitch treat your sampels as vynil decks, you can do a lot of stuff. you can add swing to specific tracks or nudge specific steps.

What to try to master at first is to control your samples.
Sometimes your samples will continue playing and at first you’ll be so stressed out.

Tips for starters.

learn to control your samples. (start, end, loop, stretch, etc)
learn to control parts and effects. (ex. some times a lfo on the filter makes painfull results)
learn to manage your samples. (where everthing is)
4.idealize a set around your tracks.

and have fun I guess.

pklaff · 2021-06-10T09:18:54.616Z

So ecco_jams, any return of experience on that 6 years later ?

soulfood · 2021-06-10T09:50:07.051Z

Get a push. If you have all the tools in ableton to make the music you want, a more interesting way of interacting with the software may be more appropriate than learning a whole new frame work that doesn’t have a fraction of the tools.

Then get an octatrack.

Supercolor_T-120 · 2021-06-10T18:03:00.829Z

Also if you use loops whose lengths aren’t directly related to each other you can always trigger them directly and then use LFOs, scenes and/or the sequencer to manipulate them (effects, pan, level, pitch/speed, etc) rather than to trigger them. It’s possible to make stuff on the Octatrack without ever even touching the sequencer.

EDIT: forgot to check the post dates.

Analogue5 · 2021-06-10T21:31:57.450Z

Not sure If your used to software only or have external controllers, you may want to start smaller, but I don’t know how dedicated/sold you are on learning the OT.
I despised menu based instruments/hardware for a while but elektrons abilities sold me. If you haven’t worked with any hardware as of yet I’d say the OT will be easy to get your money back if it’s not for you as long as you buy it used. I started w/DT and it was a sinch to learn. OT just has way more options and some things like sampling, more steps for set up.

Other than there just being so many things to learn it’s not difficult, but I don’t know what your approach to recording and putting together a track is so you may be working in a way that is in a different approach but since the OT is so modular you have many ways to approach the same thing. Have fun!