tbh, it already was first :wink: when i rustled up that (corrupted)link, i was trying to help and not seem reproachful, it was discussed comprehensively very recently !
i can see why there are no stickies here, but it’s a shame that mining this resource is sometimes tricky, but sometimes, as baddcr points out, there are new wheels that get re-invented ! (i thought your thought for the delayed hi-hat retrigger was quite thought provoking) it’s the chance to glean new insights or ways of adapting/exploiting these little epiphanies that draws me in here (again, whilst i systematically use unipolar modulators in Max/Lemur/NordMod/Aalto/Kaivo it hadn’t been my first thought to explore similar routes in the LFO designer) - another nice #OTtip to have in the bag is to set up a low-val flatline dc-offset style lfo design and use the lfo amount to exert fine control on a param that would otherwise be too coarse/steppy
I am thinking long term about setting up design templates of tailored ramps and shapes, it can be a bit too long winded in practice to get accurate stuff[/quote]
Haha, nice. Nah, I think you’re right, it’s that thing (Eno?) about getting it right but also getting it slightly wrong - evolution!

Glad that piqued your interest :slight_smile: You have more good thoughts there too. I’ve used that low-value flat line trick before, as well as scaled-down triangles that only go from 4 to -4. It’s interesting with these to hear what the resolution of the parameters really is - in most cases it’s a decent amount higher than the 0-127 or +/- 64 you get without LFOs.
I’ve thought about setting up templates before too but I’ve never gone all the way with it, partly out of laziness and partly out of fear of project corruption. Might be cool to set some up and post them somewhere to share.