No

[Lwhdrmnjyr]

@scarfypedia

I hope they get some love in the future, but they are certainly useable as-is. Any updates will probably be minor bug fixes, quality-of-life changes, and maybe a new feature or two (option to change attack type would be AMAZING but we can only dream)

honestly at this point I’d take the second LFO over attack manipulation

This is exactly what I am hoping for when I am talking about update, second LFO or attack manipulation and slide/portamento function. Do you think it could happen? I am not sure how weak the model cpu is compared to syntakt but I assume portamento/added LFO does not need much power?

@khapankov

ektron released new machines for Syntakt which resemble the structure of Cycles machines

The big difference as far as I understand it is the cycles has a special structures for the specific knobs per machine which requires “special” effort to create new machine for it. I do not believe you can just add machine as easy as on the syntakt, at least from reading Ess answer on the subject…

@Ess

No plans so far. It is technically possible, but making a machine takes a lot of work from both me and our DSP engineer Oscar who implements it on hardware (in assembler!) … So a lot of time has to be allocated for it and at the moment we want to focus on other things.