My workflow with AR and Ableton - and let's share thoughts!

I work with the Analog Rytm mkII in Ableton, but I find it somewhat tedious to use. So I am curious to hear about other peoples’ workflows when going from idea to full tracks. Below I will go through my workflow and what positives and negatives I experience. But I wonder what you do - do you record the individual tracks at some point and why? If so, how do you work with them afterwards? Or perhaps you sequence the AR from Ableton? Or something completely different I haven’t thought of?

My workflow
I often start a new track by playing on the AR, making drums and bass. I do electro, so starting with drums and bass usually works well. Oftentimes I won’t even have my laptop turned on at this stage, but just come up with ideas and jam around. Eventually I will get to a solid idea, consisting of a few main patterns that I would like to take into a whole track

At this point I will get Ableton going and I will begin to add some synth sounds for melody, pads or whatever, making a few scenes in the session view. Basically trying to come up with something that can work as the “verse”, “chorus” and perhaps a few other variations. At this point I will trigger the main patterns on the AR using midi clips. All sounds from the AR come in from Overbridge on individual tracks, so I can work with levels, effects and so on for each of them.

When the main parts of the track are ready I shift to the arrangement view and begin to pull all the parts together in their right sequence, working on intro, build-ups and outros, doing automation and reworking and adjusting whatever I feel is not quite right. I still use midi clips to trigger patterns on the AR and the number of patterns naturally increase as I make variations and fills and so on. This goes on until I consider the track complete.

The good points
I love the whole part about creating new ideas on the AR. I got it because I like the tactile feel of working with hardware. It’s just a lot of fun to play around with and I like that I can dig into sound design and the many features the machine has. I also like the sequencer. I especially find that for basses I end up doing things I wouldn’t do if playing the keys of a synth, especially with P-locks making it possible to manipulate the sounds in the sequence in interesting ways.

To some extent, I also like the depth of the machine. I like the idea that I can keep on exploring it for literally years to come and keep coming up with new ways of using it, probably also for other things than just drums and bass.

The bad points
I find managing clips and patterns to be a real hassle. Everything is a new midi clip. Add a few snare hits for a fill? That’s a pattern. Removing a few kicks for another variation? One more pattern, there you go. Having a section with high hats at half tempo? Another pattern for you, sir.
Of course you could say “how many patterns do you actually have? Surely you can work through it” and that would be a fair point. But it is not just about having them on the timeline on Ableton. It is also about maintaining some kind of order on the AR so I can understand which patterns are where and what they do. I might still want to add in a section or switch around some variations, which is cumbersome to reflect on the AR.

There is also the whole thing about mapping midi notes to patterns. Pattern B4 is…. ehr, G-1 perhaps? A lot of counting and checking if things are correctly assigned.

I come from using midi clips with note info in them for drums and that is not a lot of fun when creating ideas. But it’s much more convenient when getting into the nitty gritty and I do miss it for the later stages of the process when creating a track.

What could I do differently?
One thing I have thought about is to begin to just record the patterns. That would free me from trying to maintain some kind of order of the patterns on the AR. Perhaps it won’t be much more efficient though, as every small edit has to be recorded (or edited in audio, of course)

Another idea is to sequence the AR from Ableton. So I would first come up with ideas on the AR, then recreate the midi notes in Ableton. However, I think this will rob me of using P-locks, which is one of the great things about the Elektron sequencer. Unless I recreate the P-locks with automation (which just occurred to me now, as I am writing this). Perhaps that could work….

Sometimes I also wonder if I should just get rid of the AR altogether and try out something like a Push or just some drum controller to play around with Drum Racks in Ableton. That could give me the tactility when coming up with ideas, while also bringing me back into the “midi clips with notes in them”-World. Perhaps I could combine it with an Analog Four to keep that way of sequencing synths, which I like a lot.


So that’s it. What is your workflow like and do you think there are smarter ways to use the AR?

Oh, and wild suggestions like “Get an Octatrack instead of Ableton” and “Why not just buy an MPC” are welcome too!

2 Likes

I use Syntakt with Ableton Live 12 Suite and a Push 2 (soon to be a Push 3 controller version). Syntakt for me serves the same purpose as AR for you. It’s my main ideas machine, where I create beats, bass lines and lead/melody lines.

For me, using Push with Syntakt was the breakthrough. I set fixed length recording on the Push (4 bars) and record individual patterns on Syntakt as audio clips into Live using the Session view on Push. Essentially just jamming ideas within a pattern on Syntakt, find something I like, print it as an audio clip in Live then move onto a new idea on Syntakt all within the same pattern (ie playing around with mutes, control all etc).

I can very quickly build up over a dozen variations of the same Syntakt pattern with each recorded as audio clips in Live. This is all via MIDI clock with audio direct from the ST into my audio interface. I don’t use OB now, I find it easier to record the ST main output with all FX included then play around with the audio clips.

Once I’ve got a bunch of audio clips from the ST I start to arrange this into the rough shape of the backbone of a song on the Push by moving different clips around.

Then I’ll add other drums and instruments on the Push itself (love the Push step sequencer, it’s great) plus samples for textures, beatsliced loops etc.

2 Likes

Using the AR with Ableton and Overbridge is brilliant. Having the ability to process the individual channels in the box whilst crafting the source material using the hardware is such a great way to work.
I’ve yet to find a software alternative that sounds as good.

I usually make an 8 bar pattern with conditionals to make it a 16 bar pattern. I use the Rytm mainly just for drums. Once I’ve got most of the track written ITB, I will bounce the 16 bars down to individual tracks. I’m then free to chop them up however I want, I generally find I have enough to work with but depending on the track might add some extra elements with samples/loops.

I began to really love the Rytm when I stopped trying to do too much of the track with it, mainly use it for Kicks, snares, Hats and maybe some perc.

I always use a fresh project for each track and save it with the correct name so I can come back and make changes if something jumps out during mix down that would be easier to change rather than engineer.

1 Like

This is a cool idea :wink:

1 Like

when I got the rytm about 2 years ago I was in the same position, I tried every possible workflow there is, starting from clips with program changes and using OB to record individual tracks, but I just couldn’t make it work, it was way too much boilerplate and it took way too much time to get anywhere, plus, there was a problem of latency that I just couldn’t figure out, the audio coming from OB always had jitter, I tried using USB midi and have OB sync on off and just get the audio from OB, but that didn’t resolve everything.
then, I started recording audio via individual outs and sending midi from the audio interface, and this was by far the most solid clock and as I had direct monitoring which I could use to quickly start with a pattern before starting building on the individual tracks, and even then my MOTU ULmk5 had so little roundtrip that I could just switch to the Live’s monitoring and use latency free fx on the fly.
this method imo was the “fastest” one and the “more productive”, if I’d start using rytm as a companion for anything I would be doing that route for sure.
thing is, I really love the rytm’s internal fx and the master distortion/compressor, working with individual outs makes using these quite a hassle, the only way to use a compressor is to route the audio back to rytm EXT IN or if you’d want to use the master distortion too then you’d have to use OB routing.
at the moment I’m working with rytm standalone and this is obviously very limited to whatever rytm can do, but for now that’s all I need so I am hassle free, every other workflow is a mood killer for me atm, it requires boilerplate, using the computer in tandem constantly, external fx to compensate for comp/distortion which I don’t have, etc…

if you want to work hybrid, imo it boils down to 2 preferences:

  • I want/need project callback - this would require a system for clips, program changes, saving and documenting everything, you can make it easier with OB Total Recall imo but it would still need a hefty chunk of administrative work.
  • I can print my work and move on with my life - you can use a kit or two, some patterns, sequence everything in rytm, record audio clips needed for your project and move on.

personally I learned to print stuff on the fly and I really love this approach, I love the human touch forced on it, there’s no way I could automate the mistakes I make while recording live and eventually I absolutely love them. but, it’s a personal thing.

JUST BECAUSE I CAN DO TOTAL RECALL DOESN’T MEAN I HAVE TO kind of thing…

try making couple of tracks this way, try the other way, try a third way if you can think of it, make a separate project for every method so it would be somewhat organized and just see what feels better, personally if I would go for hybrid approach I would most certainly go with internal sequencing and audio clips, I feel that if I’d need a change in audio clip it’s easier and faster for me to edit then dealing with midi clips, I hate the piano roll, it’s a mood killer for me, so even if I did go hybrid I’d use software sequencers rather midi clips and just capture the audio…

although he doesn’t work with the rytm, checkout @tumulishroomaroom’s youtube, I love the workflow and if I would work hybrid this is the way I would do it, there’s lots of relevant info regardless of the gear used or his music genre, imo the results are insane and he presents the workflow very clear in a way that can be applied to anyone using any external gear…

3 Likes